ArticleThe Journal of biological chemistry2013
Regulation of the activity of lactate dehydrogenases from four lactic acid bacteria.
Article in The Journal of biological chemistry, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
34 citing papers in PubMed, 70 citations in OpenAlex.
- A pleuromutilin-ciprofloxacin hybrid exhibits potent activity againstFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026Article
- Article
- Lactate dehydrogenase is the Achilles' heel of Lyme disease bacteriumbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Allostery and Evolution: A Molecular Journey Through the Structural and Dynamical Landscape of an Enzyme Super Family.Molecular biology and evolution · 2025Article
- Stereospecific lactylation in bacteriology: L/D-lactate partitioning shapes host metabolic-disease axis.Frontiers in microbiology · 2025Review
- L-Lactate dehydrogenase from Cyanidioschyzon merolae shows high catalytic efficiency for pyruvate reduction and is inhibited by ATP.Plant molecular biology · 2024Article
- Understanding and computational design of genetic circuits of metabolic networks.Essays in biochemistry · 2024Review
- Genomic and phenotypic characterisation of Enterococcus mundtii AM_AQ_BC8 for its anti-biofilm, antimicrobial and probiotic potential.Archives of microbiology · 2024Article
- Deciphering Evolutionary Trajectories of Lactate Dehydrogenases Provides New Insights into Allostery.Molecular biology and evolution · 2023Article
- Phenotypic Traits and Probiotic Functions ofFoods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Article
- Conversion of COProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022Article
- Revisited Metabolic Control and Reprogramming Cancers by Means of the Warburg Effect in Tumor Cells.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Review
- Protein Conformational Space at the Edge of Allostery: Turning a Nonallosteric Malate Dehydrogenase into an "Allosterized" Enzyme Using Evolution-Guided Punctual Mutations.Molecular biology and evolution · 2022Article
- Enterococcus faecalis Antagonizes Pseudomonas aeruginosa Growth in Mixed-Species Interactions.Journal of bacteriology · 2022Article
- Dissecting of the AI-2/LuxS Mediated Growth Characteristics and Bacteriostatic Ability ofFoods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Effect of Coix Seed Extracts on Growth and Metabolism ofFoods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Formation of Biofilm byFrontiers in microbiology · 2022Article
- PEGylation increases antitumoral activity of arginine deiminase of Streptococcus pyogenes.Applied microbiology and biotechnology · 2022Article
- Sugar Shock: ProbingFrontiers in microbiology · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Despite high similarity in sequence and catalytic properties, the l-lactate dehydrogenases (LDHs) in lactic acid bacteria (LAB) display differences in their regulation that may arise from their adaptation to different habitats. We combined experimental and computational approaches to investigate the effects of fructose 1,6-bisphosphate (FBP), phosphate (Pi), and ionic strength (NaCl concentration) on six LDHs from four LABs studied at pH 6 and pH 7. We found that 1) the extent of activation by FBP (Kact) differs. Lactobacillus plantarum LDH is not regulated by FBP, but the other LDHs are activated with increasing sensitivity in the following order: Enterococcus faecalis LDH2 ≤ Lactococcus lactis LDH2 < E. faecalis LDH1 < L. lactis LDH1 ≤ Streptococcus pyogenes LDH. This trend reflects the electrostatic properties in the allosteric binding site of the LDH enzymes. 2) For L. plantarum, S. pyogenes, and E. faecalis, the effects of Pi are distinguishable from the effect of changing ionic strength by adding NaCl. 3) Addition of Pi inhibits E. faecalis LDH2, whereas in the absence of FBP, Pi is an activator of S. pyogenes LDH, E. faecalis LDH1, and L. lactis LDH1 and LDH2 at pH 6. These effects can be interpreted by considering the computed binding affinities of Pi to the catalytic and allosteric binding sites of the enzymes modeled in protonation states corresponding to pH 6 and pH 7. Overall, the results show a subtle interplay among the effects of Pi, FBP, and pH that results in different regulatory effects on the LDHs of different LABs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.