Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23720223›Full record

Trial reportHead & neck2014

Transoral robotic approach to carcinoma of unknown primary.

Kasim Durmus, Sanjeet V Rangarajan, Matthew O Old, Amit Agrawal, Theodoros N Teknos, Enver Ozer

Open access · greenAbstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Head & neck, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
7.5field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 102 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. A systematic review on Transoral robotic surgery (TORS) for carcinoma of unknown primary origin: Has tongue base mucosectomy become indispensable?Clinical otolaryngology : official journal of ENT-UK ; official journal of Netherlands Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology & Cervico-Facial Surgery · 2020
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. The Role of Trans Oral Robotic Surgery in the Carcinoma of Unknown Primary: A New Evidence in the Horizon?Indian journal of otolaryngology and head and neck surgery : official publication of the Association of Otolaryngologists of India · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. The changing therapeutic landscape of head and neck cancer.Nature reviews. Clinical oncology · 2019
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Kasim DurmusDepartment of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Arthur G. James Cancer Hospital and Richard J. Solove Research Institute, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Wexner Medical Center at The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio.
Sanjeet V Rangarajan
Matthew O Old
Amit Agrawal
Theodoros N Teknos
Enver Ozer
The Ohio State University · USThe Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center – Arthur G. James Cancer Hospital and Richard J. Solove Research Institute · US

Funding

Translational Therapeutics Research Program (TT)P30CA016058 · NCI · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI Tasleem J Padamsee · 1985 to 2026
$132.3M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA016058
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe management of carcinoma of unknown primary (CUP) is one of the challenging conditions in head and neck oncologic surgery. Despite various diagnostic tools, the primary tumor site in more than half of cases remains unidentified. The purpose of this study was to assess the feasibility and efficiency of utilizing transoral robotic surgery (TORS) for the diagnosis and treatment of CUP in the head and neck.

methodsIn this prospective, single-institutional, clinical TORS trial, 22 of 181 patients were treated for CUP between 2008 and 2012.

resultsAmong all those 22 patients, primary tumor site identification and complete tumor removal was achieved in 17 patients (77.3%) with TORS. Tonsil (59.1%) and base of tongue (18.1%) were identified as the most common tumor locations.

conclusionTogether with panendoscopy, directed biopsies, and positron emission tomography (PET)/CT, TORS is a valuable option in the identification and treatment of primary tumor sites.

Indexed as

Neoplasms, Unknown PrimaryAdultAgedCarcinoma, Squamous CellFeasibility StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNatural Orifice Endoscopic SurgeryNeck DissectionProspective StudiesRisk FactorsRobotic Surgical ProceduresSmokingTongue Neoplasmscarcinoma of unknown primarydaVincitransoral robotic surgery

Identifiers

PMID23720223
PMCPMC4266274
OpenAlexW1597884645

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.