Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23720090›Full record

SynthesisJournal of gastroenterology2014

Pharmacologic prophylaxis of post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis: protease inhibitors and NSAIDs in a meta-analysis.

Hiroki Yuhara, Masami Ogawa, Yoshiaki Kawaguchi, Muneki Igarashi, Tooru Shimosegawa, Tetsuya Mine

2 registry-linked trialsAbstract readComparative StudyMeta-AnalysisReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of gastroenterology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 34 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
8.5field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02647554 phase4completednot on this mapstarted 2016, after this paper: background citation

A Prospective, Multi-Centre, Double-Blind, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Trial of Ulinastatin Treatment in Adult Patients With Sepsis and Septic Shock in China

TypeinterventionalSponsorPeking Union Medical College HospitalRan2016 to 2021Enrolled347ConditionsSepsis, Septic ShockArmsulinastatin, Placebo
NCT04559867 nasuspendednot on this mapstarted 2020, after this paper: background citation

Fistulotomy as the Primary Cannulation Technique for All Patients Undergoing ERCP: A Randomized, Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorLawrence Charles HookeyRan2020 to 2024Enrolled538ConditionsCholangiopancreatography, Endoscopic Retrograde, Biliary Tract DiseasesArmsNeedle knife fistulotomy, Sphincterotomy
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 89 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Article
  12. Observational
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Hiroki YuharaDepartment of Gastroenterology, Tokai University School of Medicine, 143 Shimokasuya, Isehara, 259-1193, Japan.
Masami Ogawa
Yoshiaki Kawaguchi
Muneki Igarashi
Tooru Shimosegawa
Tetsuya Mine
Tokai University · JPTohoku University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) pancreatitis is the most frequent complication of ERCP. Several meta-analyses have examined the effects of protease inhibitors (gabexate mesilate, ulinastatin, and nafamostat mesilate) and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) on post-ERCP pancreatitis, but the results have been confusing. Since the previous meta-analysis, several new studies have been published on this topic. To provide an updated quantitative assessment of the effectiveness of protease inhibitors and NSAIDs in preventing post-ERCP pancreatitis, we conducted a meta-analysis of randomized trials for patients at risk of post-ERCP pancreatitis. Twenty-six articles were included in this meta-analysis. Nafamostat mesilate (summary RR = 0.41; 95 %CI 0.28-0.59; n = 4 studies) and NSAIDs (summary RR = 0.58; 95 %CI = 0.44-0.76; n = 7 studies) were associated with decreased risk of post-ERCP pancreatitis in the high-quality studies. However, gabexate mesilate (summary RR = 0.64; 95 %CI = 0.36-1.13; n = 6 studies) and ulinastatin (summary RR = 0.65; 95 %CI = 0.33-1.30; n = 2 studies) were not associated with decreased risk of post-ERCP pancreatitis in the high-quality studies. This is the first meta-analysis to compare the effects of three protease inhibitors. Solid evidence supports the use of nafamostat mesilate and NSAIDs for preventing post-ERCP pancreatitis.

Indexed as

Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-SteroidalBenzamidinesCholangiopancreatography, Endoscopic RetrogradeGuanidinesHumansPancreatitisProtease InhibitorsRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicAnti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-SteroidalBenzamidinesGuanidinesnafamostatProtease Inhibitors

Identifiers

PMID23720090
OpenAlexW2057626737

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.