Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23720059›Full record

ArticleJournal of biomechanical engineering2013

Finite element analysis of traction force microscopy: influence of cell mechanics, adhesion, and morphology.

Rachel Zielinski, Cosmin Mihai, Douglas Kniss, Samir N Ghadiali

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of biomechanical engineering, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 41 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Connecting Aortic Stiffness to Vascular Contraction: Does Sex Matter?International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Reduced stiffness and augmented traction force in type 2 diabetic coronary microvascular smooth muscle.American journal of physiology. Heart and circulatory physiology · 2020
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Biophysical Tools to Study Cellular Mechanotransduction.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2017
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Rachel ZielinskiBiomedical Engineering Department, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210, USA.
Cosmin Mihai
Douglas Kniss
Samir N Ghadiali
The Ohio State University · USThe Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center · US

Funding

Testing/ImagingP50DC007667 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI ALPER, CUNEYT METIN · 2006 to 2017
$12.6M
Biomechanical Evaluation of Eustachian Tube DysfunctionR01DC007230 · NIDCD · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI GHADIALI, SAMIR N · 2006 to 2010
$704k
NIDCD NIH HHS DC007230NIDCD NIH HHS DC007667NIDCD NIH HHS P50 DC007667NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC007230
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The interactions between adherent cells and their extracellular matrix (ECM) have been shown to play an important role in many biological processes, such as wound healing, morphogenesis, differentiation, and cell migration. Cells attach to the ECM at focal adhesion sites and transmit contractile forces to the substrate via cytoskeletal actin stress fibers. This contraction results in traction stresses within the substrate/ECM. Traction force microscopy (TFM) is an experimental technique used to quantify the contractile forces generated by adherent cells. In TFM, cells are seeded on a flexible substrate and displacements of the substrate caused by cell contraction are tracked and converted to a traction stress field. The magnitude of these traction stresses are normally used as a surrogate measure of internal cell contractile force or contractility. We hypothesize that in addition to contractile force, other biomechanical properties including cell stiffness, adhesion energy density, and cell morphology may affect the traction stresses measured by TFM. In this study, we developed finite element models of the 2D and 3D TFM techniques to investigate how changes in several biomechanical properties alter the traction stresses measured by TFM. We independently varied cell stiffness, cell-ECM adhesion energy density, cell aspect ratio, and contractility and performed a sensitivity analysis to determine which parameters significantly contribute to the measured maximum traction stress and net contractile moment. Results suggest that changes in cell stiffness and adhesion energy density can significantly alter measured tractions, independent of contractility. Based on a sensitivity analysis, we developed a correction factor to account for changes in cell stiffness and adhesion and successfully applied this correction factor algorithm to experimental TFM measurements in invasive and noninvasive cancer cells. Therefore, application of these types of corrections to TFM measurements can yield more accurate estimates of cell contractility.

Indexed as

Models, BiologicalAnimalsCell AdhesionCell MovementCell Physiological PhenomenaCell SizeComputer SimulationElastic ModulusExtracellular MatrixFinite Element AnalysisFocal AdhesionsHumansMechanotransduction, CellularMicroscopyStress, Mechanical

Identifiers

PMID23720059
PMCPMC3705880
OpenAlexW2024200022

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.