Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23720008›Full record

ArticleJournal of applied genetics2013

Molecular cytogenetic characterisation of Salix viminalis L. using repetitive DNA sequences.

Anna Viktória Németh, Dénes Dudits, Márta Molnár-Láng, Gabriella Linc

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of applied genetics, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Anna Viktória NémethInstitute of Plant Biology, Biological Research Centre, Hungarian Academy of Sciences, Szeged, Hungary.
Dénes Dudits
Márta Molnár-Láng
Gabriella Linc
Agricultural Institute · HUHungarian Academy of Sciences · HUHUN-REN Szegedi Biológiai Kutatóközpont · HUInstitute of Plant Biology · HU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Salix viminalis L. (2n = 38) is a diploid dicot species belonging to the Salix genus of the Salicaceae family. This short-rotation woody crop is one of the most important renewable bioenergy resources worldwide. In breeding for high biomass productivity, limited knowledge is available on the molecular cytogenetics of willow, which could be combined with genetic linkage mapping. The present paper describes the adaptation of a fluorescence in situ hybridisation (FISH) protocol as a new approach to analyse the genomic constitution of Salix viminalis using the heterologous DNA clones pSc119.2, pTa71, pTa794, pAs1, Afa-family, pAl1, HT100.3, ZCF1 and the GAA microsatellite marker. Three of the nine probes showed unambiguous signals on the metaphase chromosomes. FISH analysis with the pTa71 probe detected one major 18S-5.8S-26S rDNA locus on the short arm of one chromosome pair; however, the pTa794 rDNA site was not visible. One chromosome pair showed a distinct signal around the centromeric region after FISH with the telomere-specific DNA clone HT100.3. Two chromosome pairs were found to have pAs1 FISH signals, which represent a D-genome-specific insert from Aegilops tauschii. Based on the FISH study, a set of chromosomes with characteristic patterns is presented, which could be used to establish the karyotype of willow species.

Indexed as

Genome, PlantRepetitive Sequences, Nucleic AcidBiomassChromosome MappingChromosomes, PlantDNA ProbesDNA, RibosomalGenetic LinkageIn Situ Hybridization, FluorescenceSalixSequence Analysis, DNADNA ProbesDNA, Ribosomal

Identifiers

PMID23720008
OpenAlexW2011381628

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.