ReviewDrugs2013
S-1 (Teysuno®): a review of its use in advanced gastric cancer in non-Asian populations.
Review in Drugs, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 30 citations in OpenAlex.
- S-1-based therapy versus S-1 monotherapy in advanced gastric cancer: a meta-analysis.Tumour biology : the journal of the International Society for Oncodevelopmental Biology and Medicine · 2014Pooled it
- Study of SOX combined with intraperitoneal high-dose paclitaxel in gastric cancer with synchronous peritoneal metastasis: A phase II single-arm clinical trial.Cancer medicine · 2023Trial
- Trial
- Incidence and risk factors related to ocular adverse effects caused by S-1 chemotherapy.Japanese journal of ophthalmology · 2026Article
- Molecular Compatibility in Chinese Medicine for Cancer Treatment and Drug Development: From Traditional Wisdom to Innovative Therapeutics.Chinese journal of integrative medicine · 2026Article
- Review
- Dihydropyrimidine Dehydrogenase-Mediated Resistance to 5-Fluorouracil: Mechanistic Investigation and Solution.ACS pharmacology & translational science · 2022Review
- Adjuvant tegafur-uracil (UFT) or S-1 monotherapy for advanced gastric cancer: a single center experience.World journal of surgical oncology · 2021Article
- Article
- miR-34a regulates cisplatin-induce gastric cancer cell death by modulating PI3K/AKT/survivin pathway.Tumour biology : the journal of the International Society for Oncodevelopmental Biology and Medicine · 2014Article
- Adverse effects of the oral anticancer drug s-1: lacrimal passage impairment and specific features of corneal epitheliopathy.The open ophthalmology journal · 2013Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
S-1 (Teysuno(®)) is an oral anticancer agent comprising the 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) prodrug tegafur and targeted modulators, gimeracil and oteracil. S-1 in combination with cisplatin is a recommended first-line treatment for gastrointestinal cancers in Japan and has recently been approved in the EU for the treatment of advanced gastric cancer. This article reviews S-1 pharmacology from an EU perspective. In a randomized, open-label trial in 24 non-Asian countries in patients with advanced gastric cancer, there were no significant differences between S-1 plus cisplatin and 5-FU plus cisplatin groups in median overall survival (OS) [primary endpoint], progression-free survival or overall response rate. In a post hoc analysis of OS, S-1 plus cisplatin was noninferior to 5-FU plus cisplatin. There were no significant between-group differences in patient quality of life, according to the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy (Gastric) Trial Outcome Index, except that S-1 plus cisplatin recipients had a significantly longer time to worsening in physical well-being than 5-FU plus cisplatin recipients. Overall, S-1 plus cisplatin was better tolerated than 5-FU plus cisplatin, with significantly lower rates of haematological, some gastrointestinal tract and other adverse events, serious adverse events and deaths resulting from toxicity, along with significantly fewer haematological and renal function abnormalities. Compared with 5-FU, S-1 plus cisplatin recipients had significantly higher rates of hand-foot syndrome and hyperbilirubinaemia, although there were no between-group differences in the proportions of patients with increased liver enzymes. S-1 is a useful alternative to 5-FU for patients with advanced gastric cancer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.