Trial reportClinical pharmacokinetics2013
Pharmacokinetics of oral recombinant human parathyroid hormone [rhPTH(1-31)NH₂] in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis.
Trial report in Clinical pharmacokinetics, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.
- Effective Oral Delivery of Teriparatide Using Organoclay-Polymethacrylate Nanocomposites for Osteoporosis Therapy.Pharmaceutics · 2025Article
- Drug Delivery and Therapy Strategies for Osteoporosis Intervention.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Advances in oral peptide therapeutics.Nature reviews. Drug discovery · 2020Review
- Development of Potent, Protease-Resistant Agonists of the Parathyroid Hormone Receptor with Broad β Residue Distribution.Journal of medicinal chemistry · 2017Article
- Anti-osteoporotic effects of Pueraria candollei var. mirifica on bone mineral density and histomorphometry in estrogen-deficient rats.Journal of natural medicines · 2016Article
- Lessons learned from the clinical development of oral peptides.British journal of clinical pharmacology · 2015Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
objectivesTeriparatide [rhPTH(1-34)OH] is a subcutaneously administered bone anabolic drug that increases bone mineral density (BMD) and reduces the risk of osteoporotic fracture. Because rhPTH(1-34)OH is administered by injection, oral delivery is a desirable alternative. However, the peroral delivery of peptides is challenging due to their susceptibility to protease digestion and low permeability through the intestinal layers. The objective of this study was to assess the pharmacokinetics of a PTH analog (rhPTH(1-31)NH2) in a novel oral tablet formulation and to compare them to subcutaneously administered teriparatide in postmenopausal osteoporotic women in a phase 2 proof-of-concept clinical study.
methodsThis was a 24-week repeat-dose, randomized, double blind, parallel group phase 2 study with three once-daily treatment arms: oral rhPTH(1-31)NH2 tablets (5 mg), matching placebo tablets, and open-label teriparatide (20 μg daily subcutaneous injection). The primary endpoint of this study was to assess the change in lumbar spine BMD of orally administered rhPTH(1-31)NH2 tablets compared to baseline. This study was conducted at three sites in Denmark and at one site in Estonia. The patients included were women diagnosed with postmenopausal osteoporosis as detected by lumbar spine dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry, with exclusion of those with prior treatment with bone-active agents. The study treatment consisted of orally formulated recombinant human PTH(1-31)NH2, placebo, or subcutaneous teriparatide as an active comparator.
resultsThe pharmacokinetic profile at first and last dose was evaluated and correlated with the primary endpoint, which was to characterize the percent change from baseline in BMD of the lumbar spine after 24 weeks of once daily treatment with rhPTH(1-31)NH2. The pharmacokinetic profile for the tablets showed a pulsatile peak with durations of at least 1 h but less than 5 h, which is consistent with the requirement for bone anabolic activity. The mean maximum (peak) plasma drug concentration (C max) values for patients receiving tablets at week 0 (n = 32) and week 24 (n = 28) were 295 and 207 pg/mL, respectively. The mean time to reach maximum (peak) plasma concentration following drug administration (t max) for both week 0 and week 24 was 3.25 h. The mean area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) for week 0 and week 24 was 178 and 141 pg·h/mL, respectively. No significant differences were observed between weeks 0 and 24 in any pharmacokinetic parameters tested, demonstrating good reproducibility, no time-dependent changes, and little or no accumulation of the study drug. The systemic exposure as measured by C max values was higher for the oral tablets formulation than for subcutaneous teriparatide.
conclusionsThe observed data demonstrate that the enteric-coated tablet formulation technology was able to generate consistently robust and pulsatile levels of exposure of rhPTH(1-31)NH2. There was no apparent correlation between higher exposures and adverse events, even though the pharmacokinetic variability was somewhat higher with the tablets. These positive results recommend this orally delivered drug candidate for further clinical development.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.