Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23718923›Full record

ArticleDaru : journal of Faculty of Pharmacy, Tehran University of Medical Sciences2013

A tale of two systems: poisoning management in Iran and the United States.

Omid Mehrpour, Nasim Zamani, Jeffrey Brent, Mohammad Abdollahi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Daru : journal of Faculty of Pharmacy, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Substance Use among Poisoned Teenage Patients.Iranian journal of public health · 2019
    Article
  5. Article
  6. A Narrative Review of Acute Adult Poisoning in Iran.Iranian journal of medical sciences · 2017
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Outpatient treatment of the poisoned patients in Iran; may it be a feasible plan?Daru : journal of Faculty of Pharmacy, Tehran University of Medical Sciences · 2013
    Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Omid MehrpourUniversity of Colorado, School of Medicine, Denver, CO, USA. Jeffrey.Brent@UCDenver.Edu.
Nasim Zamani
Jeffrey Brent
Mohammad Abdollahi

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Poisoning morbidity and mortality is high in the developing world. Systems for care of poisoned patients differ markedly between countries. In this paper a comparison of two very different systems for the care of poisoned patients, is presented. Specifically, the role of poison centers and poison treatment centers in the US and Iran are contrasted. A systematic literature search was undertaken utilizing the PubMed, Scopus, and Google Scholar and the keywords "poison centers", "treatment" "Iran" "United States of America" and 100 publications were identified. From these, relevant data were found in 23 publications. The information was double-checked and data were summarized herein.We find that the system of the care of poisoned patients relies heavily on certified poison centers in the US and that only a few hospitals have well developed medical toxicology services. In contrast, in Iran, the poison center system is somehow less developed and the care of poisoned patients is provided in centralized high volume hospital poison units.Although both the US and Iran have highly developed systems for the care of poisoned patients they are distinctly different. Comparative studies based on these systems could provide important data for developing countries with more rudimentary poison control and treatment facilities.

Identifiers

PMID23718923
PMCPMC3669081

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.