Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23718849›Full record

ArticleJournal of ophthalmic inflammation and infection2013

Corneal cross linking and infectious keratitis: a systematic review with a meta-analysis of reported cases.

Jorge L Alio, Alessandro Abbouda, David Diaz Valle, Jose M Benitez Del Castillo, Jose A Gegundez Fernandez

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of ophthalmic inflammation and infection, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02865876 (Effectiveness of Corneal Accelerated Crosslinking Versus Conventional Treatment for Infectious Keratitis), which is not on this map. Cited by 46 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
46citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02865876 phase3unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2015, after this paper: background citation

Effectiveness of Corneal Accelerated Crosslinking Versus Conventional Treatment for Infectious Keratitis

TypeinterventionalSponsorInstituto de Oftalmología Fundación Conde de ValencianaRan2015 to 2017Enrolled264ConditionsKeratitisArmsAccelerated Corneal Cross-linking
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

46 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Corneal collagen cross-linking for bacterial infectious keratitis.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2020
    Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Photobiomodulation of the Visual System and Human Health.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Commentary: PACK-CXL in fungal keratitis.Indian journal of ophthalmology · 2019
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jorge L AlioVissum Corporación Oftalmológica, Alicante 03016, Spain. jlalio@vissum.com.
Alessandro Abbouda
David Diaz Valle
Jose M Benitez Del Castillo
Jose A Gegundez Fernandez

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCollagen cross linking (CXL) of the cornea has been developed recently as a new treatment for multidrug-resistant infectious keratitis. The aim of this study is to summarize the previously published data and evaluate the effectiveness of this treatment.

resultsThe search identified 12 articles. The number of eyes was 104. The infectious keratitis was associated with bacteria in 58 eyes (57f%): Gram-positive bacteria in 44 (43%; 4 of which were infected with Mycobacterium (3.6%)) and Gram-negative bacteria in 14 eyes (13%), fungus in 13 eyes (12%), and Acanthamoeba in 7 eyes (7%). In 26 eyes (25%), the microbiological culture was negative or not performed. The mean time of re-epithelization after CXL was 20.7±28.1 days (minimum of 3, maximum of 145). Sixteen eyes underwent deep or lamellar keratoplasty. The pooled analysis suggested that CXL has a favorable effect on the block of corneal melting in 85% (95%; CI 0.77, 0.91) of eyes.

conclusionAlthough randomized controlled trials are needed, the available evidence supports the use of CXL in the treatment of infectious keratitis.

Identifiers

PMID23718849
PMCPMC3671959

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.