ArticleFrontiers in oncology2013
The role of tumor tissue architecture in treatment penetration and efficacy: an integrative study.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
33 citing papers in PubMed.
- Machine learning-assisted exploration of multidrug-drug administration regimens for organoid arrays.Science advances · 2025Article
- Using mathematical modelling and AI to improve delivery and efficacy of therapies in cancer.Nature reviews. Cancer · 2025Review
- Multiscale Porosity Microfluidics to Study Bacterial Transport in Heterogeneous Chemical Landscapes.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2024Article
- Exploring chronic and transient tumor hypoxia for predicting the efficacy of hypoxia-activated pro-drugs.NPJ systems biology and applications · 2024Article
- Synthetic living materials in cancer biology.Nature reviews bioengineering · 2023Article
- Article
- In Vivo Click Chemistry Enables Multiplexed Intravital Microscopy.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2022Article
- The impact of the spatial heterogeneity of resistant cells and fibroblasts on treatment response.PLoS computational biology · 2022Article
- Ion Channels, Transporters, and Sensors Interact with the Acidic Tumor Microenvironment to Modify Cancer Progression.Reviews of physiology, biochemistry and pharmacology · 2022Review
- Mathematical simulation and prediction of tumor volume using RBF artificial neural network at different circumstances in the tumor microenvironment.Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part H, Journal of engineering in medicine · 2021Article
- Mechanical Studies of the Third Dimension in Cancer: From 2D to 3D Model.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021Review
- Adaptive Therapy for Metastatic Melanoma: Predictions from Patient Calibrated Mathematical Models.Cancers · 2021Article
- Measuring Nanoparticle Penetration Through Bio-Mimetic Gels.International journal of nanomedicine · 2021Article
- A computational diffusion model to study antibody transport within reconstructed tumor microenvironments.BMC bioinformatics · 2020Article
- Mathematical modelling reveals cellular dynamics within tumour spheroids.PLoS computational biology · 2020Article
- Hybrid modeling frameworks of tumor development and treatment.Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Systems biology and medicine · 2020Review
- Micropharmacology: An In Silico Approach for Assessing Drug Efficacy Within a Tumor Tissue.Bulletin of mathematical biology · 2019Article
- The many faces of mathematical modelling in oncology.The British journal of radiology · 2019Review
- Spatial Heterogeneity and Evolutionary Dynamics Modulate Time to Recurrence in Continuous and Adaptive Cancer Therapies.Cancer research · 2018Article
- A model-based analysis of tissue targeting efficacy of nanoparticles.Journal of the Royal Society, Interface · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Despite the great progress that has been made in understanding cancer biology and the potential molecular targets for its treatment, the majority of drugs fail in the clinical trials. This may be attributed (at least in part) to the complexity of interstitial drug transport in the patient's body, which is hard to test experimentally. Similarly, recent advances in molecular imaging have led to the development of targeted biomarkers that can predict pharmacological responses to therapeutic interventions. However, both the drug and biomarker molecules need to access the tumor tissue and be taken up into individual cells in concentrations sufficient to exert the desired effect. To investigate the process of drug penetration at the mesoscopic level we developed a computational model of interstitial transport that incorporates the biophysical properties of the tumor tissue, including its architecture and interstitial fluid flow, as well as the properties of the agents. This model is based on the method of regularized Stokeslets to describe the fluid flow coupled with discrete diffusion-advection-reaction equations to model the dynamics of the drugs. Our results show that the tissue cellular porosity and density influence the depth of penetration in a non-linear way, with sparsely packed tissues being traveled through more slowly than the denser tissues. We demonstrate that irregularities in the cell spatial configurations result in the formation of interstitial corridors that are followed by agents leading to the emergence of tissue zones with less exposure to the drugs. We describe how the model can be integrated with in vivo experiments to test the extravasation and penetration of the targeted biomarkers through the tumor tissue. A better understanding of tissue- or compound-specific factors that limit the penetration through the tumors is important for non-invasive diagnoses, chemotherapy, the monitoring of treatment responses, and the detection of tumor recurrence.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.