Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23717196›Full record

ArticlePLoS computational biology2013

Inference of gene regulatory networks with sparse structural equation models exploiting genetic perturbations.

Xiaodong Cai, Juan Andrés Bazerque, Georgios B Giannakis

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS computational biology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 51 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
51citing papers in PubMed
7.9field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

51 citing papers in PubMed, 158 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. A Selective Review of Network Analysis Methods for Gene Expression Data.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2025
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Quantitative omnigenic model discovers interpretable genome-wide associations.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Analysis of Variance of Multiple Causal Networks.Advances in neural information processing systems · 2023
    Article
  12. Article
  13. A nonlinear sparse neural ordinary differential equation model for multiple functional processes.The Canadian journal of statistics = Revue canadienne de statistique · 2022
    Article
  14. The gene regulatory network ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2022
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Integration strategies of multi-omics data for machine learning analysis.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2021
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Xiaodong CaiDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Miami, Coral Gables, FL, USA. x.cai@miami.edu
Juan Andrés Bazerque
Georgios B Giannakis
Twin Cities Orthopedics · USUniversity of Miami · USUniversity of Minnesota · US

Funding

Sparse Structural Equation Models for Gene Networks and Chemical GenomicsR01GM104975 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI CORAL GABLES · PI CAI, XIAODONG · 2012 to 2016
$1.8M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM104975NIGMS NIH HHS R01GM104975-01
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Integrating genetic perturbations with gene expression data not only improves accuracy of regulatory network topology inference, but also enables learning of causal regulatory relations between genes. Although a number of methods have been developed to integrate both types of data, the desiderata of efficient and powerful algorithms still remains. In this paper, sparse structural equation models (SEMs) are employed to integrate both gene expression data and cis-expression quantitative trait loci (cis-eQTL), for modeling gene regulatory networks in accordance with biological evidence about genes regulating or being regulated by a small number of genes. A systematic inference method named sparsity-aware maximum likelihood (SML) is developed for SEM estimation. Using simulated directed acyclic or cyclic networks, the SML performance is compared with that of two state-of-the-art algorithms: the adaptive Lasso (AL) based scheme, and the QTL-directed dependency graph (QDG) method. Computer simulations demonstrate that the novel SML algorithm offers significantly better performance than the AL-based and QDG algorithms across all sample sizes from 100 to 1,000, in terms of detection power and false discovery rate, in all the cases tested that include acyclic or cyclic networks of 10, 30 and 300 genes. The SML method is further applied to infer a network of 39 human genes that are related to the immune function and are chosen to have a reliable eQTL per gene. The resulting network consists of 9 genes and 13 edges. Most of the edges represent interactions reasonably expected from experimental evidence, while the remaining may just indicate the emergence of new interactions. The sparse SEM and efficient SML algorithm provide an effective means of exploiting both gene expression and perturbation data to infer gene regulatory networks. An open-source computer program implementing the SML algorithm is freely available upon request.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsModels, GeneticCell LineComputational BiologyComputer SimulationGene Regulatory NetworksHapMap ProjectHumansImmune System PhenomenaQuantitative Trait Loci

Identifiers

PMID23717196
PMCPMC3662697
OpenAlexW2055234679

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.