Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23717014›Full record

ArticleAnnals of dermatology2013

Extramammary paget disease: minimal surgical therapy.

Ji-Hyun Choi, Mihn-Sook Jue, Eun-Jung Kim, Ok-Ja Joh, Kye-Yong Song, Hyang-Joon Park

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of dermatology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Mapping Biopsy for Primary Extramammary Paget's Disease in Reducing Recurrence Following Surgical Excision.Annals of surgery open : perspectives of surgical history, education, and clinical approaches · 2023
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Surgical Treatment for Extramammary Paget's Disease.Current treatment options in oncology · 2018
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ji-Hyun ChoiDepartment of Dermatology, VHS Medical Center, Seoul, Korea.
Mihn-Sook Jue
Eun-Jung Kim
Ok-Ja Joh
Kye-Yong Song
Hyang-Joon Park
Seoul Medical Center · KRChung-Ang University · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundExtramammary Paget disease (EMPD) is an uncommon malignant neoplasm affecting apocrine gland-bearing skin which usually occurs in the anogenital area of patients older than 50 years. Although Mohs micrographic surgery (MMS) is recommended for the treatment of EMPD, wide local excision has also been performed by many other surgeons including dermatosurgeons. However, the extent of an adequate resection margin is still under debate.

objectiveThe efficacy of minimal surgical therapy consisting of a wide excision combined with preoperative multiple scouting biopsies and postoperative topical imiquimod was investigated for the treatment of EMPD in Korean patients.

methodsBetween 2006 and 2012, 10 patients with primary EMPD were treated with wide surgical excision, with a surgical margin of less than 2.5 cm. Multiple preoperative scouting biopsies and postoperative topical imiquimod were also performed to delineate the lesional boundaries and to reduce the recurrence rate.

resultsDuring the 6-year follow-up period, complications and recurrences were not observed.

conclusionMinimal surgical therapy may be an effective alternative when MMS is unavailable.

Indexed as

Extramammary Paget diseaseImiquimodMinimal surgical therapyScouting biopsy

Identifiers

PMID23717014
PMCPMC3662916
OpenAlexW2156724798

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.