Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23716991›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of gastroenterology2013

Rectal gastrointestinal stromal tumors: imaging features with clinical and pathological correlation.

Zhao-Xia Jiang, Sheng-Jian Zhang, Wei-Jun Peng, Bao-Hua Yu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of gastroenterology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. A Low rectal GIST.BMJ case reports · 2022
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Polypoid endometriosis: a mimic of malignancy.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2020
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Management of rectal gastrointestinal stromal tumor.Translational gastroenterology and hepatology · 2018
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. How best to manage gastrointestinal stromal tumor.World journal of clinical oncology · 2017
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Zhao-Xia JiangDepartment of Radiology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai 200032, China.
Sheng-Jian Zhang
Wei-Jun Peng
Bao-Hua Yu

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimTo investigate computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) manifestations of rectal gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) in order to enhance the recognition of these rare tumors.

methodsFourteen patients with pathologically proven rectal GISTs were retrospectively reviewed. Patient histories were retrospectively reviewed for patient age, gender, presenting symptoms, endoscopic investigations, operation notes and pathologic slides. All tumors were evaluated for CD117, CD34 expression, and the tumors were stratified according to current criteria of the National Institutes of Health (NIH). In all cases the first pre-operation imaging findings (CT and MRI, n = 3; MRI only, n = 8; CT only, n = 3) were analyzed by two experienced radiologists by consensus, which include: tumor size, shape, CT density (hypodense, isodense and hyperdense), MRI signal intensity (hypointense, isointense and hyperintense), epicenter (intraluminal or extraluminal), margin (well-defined or ill-defined), internal component (presence of calcifications, necrosis, hemorrhage or ulceration), pattern and degree of enhancement, invasion into adjacent structures. After review of the radiologic studies, clinical and pathological findings were correlated with radiological findings.

resultsThe patients, 13 men and 1 woman, were aged 31-62 years (mean = 51.5 ± 10.7 years). The most common initial presentation was hematochezia (n = 6). The mean tumor diameter was 5.68 ± 2.64 cm (range 1.5-11.2 cm). Eight lesions were round or oval, and 6 lesions were irregular. Eleven lesions were well-defined and 3 had ill-defined margins. Ten tumors were extraluminal and 4 were intraluminal. The density and MR signal intensity of the solid component of the lesions were similar to that of muscle on unenhanced CT (n = 6) and T1-weighted images (n = 11), and hyperintense on T2-weighted MR images. Calcification was detected in 2 tumors. Following intravenous injection of contrast media, 3 lesions had mild enhancement and 11 lesions had moderate enhancement. Enhancement was homogenous in 3 lesions and heterogeneous in 11. In 1 of 11 patients who underwent both CT and MRI, the tumor was homogenous on CT scan and heterogeneous on MRI. Eight patients were classified as high risk according to the modified recurrent risk classification system of NIH.

conclusionRectal GISTs usually manifest as large, well-circumscribed, exophytic masses with moderate and heterogeneous enhancement on CT and MRI. The invasion of adjacent organs, bowel obstruction and local adenopathy are uncommon.

Indexed as

Magnetic Resonance ImagingTomography, X-Ray ComputedAdultAntigens, CD34Biomarkers, TumorBiopsyColonoscopyEndosonographyFemaleGastrointestinal Stromal TumorsHumansImmunohistochemistryMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm InvasivenessPredictive Value of TestsAntigens, CD34Biomarkers, TumorProto-Oncogene Proteins c-kitComputed tomographyGastrointestinal stromal tumorsMagnetic resonance imagingRectum

Identifiers

PMID23716991
PMCPMC3662951

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.