ArticleWorld journal of gastroenterology2013
Development and application of a real-time polymerase chain reaction method for Campylobacter jejuni detection.
Article in World journal of gastroenterology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- Review of Detection Limits for Various Techniques for Bacterial Detection in Food Samples.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Adaptation of a Commercial Qualitative BAXFoods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- A sensitive gold-nanorods-based nanobiosensor for specific detection of Campylobacter jejuni and Campylobacter coli.Journal of nanobiotechnology · 2019Article
- The Application Analysis of Multiplex Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction Assays for Detection of Pathogenic Bacterium in Peritoneal Dialysis-Associated Peritonitis.Blood purification · 2019Article
- Presenting a rapid method for detection ofIranian journal of basic medical sciences · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimTo develop a real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) method to detect and quantify Campylobacter jejuni (C. jejuni) from stool specimens.
methodsPrimers and a probe for real-time PCR were designed based on the specific DNA sequence of the hipO gene in C. jejuni. The specificity of the primers and probe were tested against a set of Campylobacter spp. and other enteric pathogens. The optimal PCR conditions were determined by testing a series of conditions with standard a C. jejuni template. The detection limits were obtained using purified DNA from bacterial culture and extracted DNA from the stool specimen. Two hundred and forty-two specimens were analyzed for the presence of C. jejuni by direct bacterial culture and real-time PCR.
resultsThe optimal PCR system was determined using reference DNA templates, 1 × uracil-DNA glycosylase, 3.5 mmol/L MgCl2, 1.25 U platinum Taq polymerase, 0.4 mmol/L PCR nucleotide mix, 0.48 μmol/L of each primer, 0.2 μmol/L of probe and 2 μL of DNA template in a final volume of 25 μL. The PCR reaction was carried as follows: 95 °C for 4 min, followed by 45 cycles of 10 s at 95 °C and 30 s at 59 °C. The detection limit was 4.3 CFU/mL using purified DNA from bacterial culture and 10(3) CFU/g using DNA from stool specimens. Twenty (8.3%, 20/242) C. jejuni strains were isolated from bacterial culture, while 41 (16.9%, 41/242) samples were found to be positive by real-time PCR. DNA sequencing of the PCR product indicated the presence of C. jejuni in the specimen. One mixed infection of C. jejuni and Salmonella was detected in one specimen and the PCR test for this specimen was positive.
conclusionThe sensitivity of detection of C. jejuni from stool specimens was much higher using this PCR assay than using the direct culture method.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.