ArticleWorld journal of gastroenterology2013
Neoadjuvant-intensified treatment for rectal cancer: time to change?
Article in World journal of gastroenterology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
30 citing papers in PubMed, 52 citations in OpenAlex.
- Induction FOLFOX followed by preoperative hyperfractionated radiotherapy plus bolus 5-fluorouracil in locally advanced rectal carcinoma: single arm phase I-II study.Medical oncology (Northwood, London, England) · 2015Trial
- Conditional survival rates after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy combined with surgery in intermediate-low locally advanced rectal cancer based on two-centre retrospective analysis.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Total neoadjuvant therapy integrating long-course radiotherapy with trifluridine/tipiracil for locally advanced rectal cancer: a single-arm, multicenter phase 2 trial.EClinicalMedicine · 2025Article
- Daxx Variation as a Potential Predictive Marker of the Therapeutic Response to Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy in Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer.Cancer medicine · 2025Article
- Is clinical complete response as accurate as pathological complete response in patients with mid-low locally advanced rectal cancer?Annals of coloproctology · 2025Article
- Development and Cross-Institutional Validation of a Comprehensive Machine Learning Model Predicting Response to Neoadjuvant Therapy for Rectal Cancer.Cancer management and research · 2025Article
- Efficacies of radiotherapy in rectal cancer patients treated with total mesorectal excision or other types of surgery: an updated meta-analysis.Oncology reviews · 2025Review
- Role of Oxaliplatin in the Neoadjuvant Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy in Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer: a Review of Evidence.Clinical Medicine Insights. Oncology · 2024Review
- Survival outcomes of different neoadjuvant treatment regimens in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer and MRI-detected extramural venous invasion.Cancer medicine · 2023Article
- Identification of patients with locally advanced rectal cancer eligible for neoadjuvant chemotherapy alone: Results of a retrospective study.Cancer medicine · 2023Article
- Clinical significance of adjuvant chemotherapy for pathological complete response rectal cancer patients with acellular mucin pools after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy.Therapeutic advances in gastroenterology · 2023Article
- Article
- Definitive weekly hypofractionated radiotherapy in cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma: response rates and outcomes in elderly patients unfit for surgery.International journal of dermatology · 2022Article
- The Effect of Continuing Chemotherapy after Chemoradiotherapy during the Time to Surgery on Tumor Response and Survival for Local Advanced Rectal Cancer.Journal of oncology · 2022Article
- Treatment in locally advanced rectal cancer: a machine learning bibliometric analysis.Therapeutic advances in gastroenterology · 2021Review
- Analysis of long-term oncological results of clinical versus pathological responses after neoadjuvant treatment in locally advanced rectal cancer.World journal of surgical oncology · 2020Article
- Decision tree algorithm in locally advanced rectal cancer: an example of over-interpretation and misuse of a machine learning approach.Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2020Article
- Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer: Treatment Approach in Elderly Patients.Current treatment options in oncology · 2020Review
- Dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging in locally advanced rectal cancer: role of perfusion parameters in the assessment of response to treatment.La Radiologia medica · 2019Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimTo investigate whether neoadjuvant-intensified radiochemotherapy improved overall and disease-free survival in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer.
methodsBetween January 2007 and December 2011, 80 patients with histologically confirmed rectal adenocarcinoma were enrolled. Tumors were clinically classified as either T3 or T4 and by the N stage based on the presence or absence of positive regional lymph nodes. Patients received intensified combined modality treatment, consisting of neoadjuvant radiation therapy (50.4-54.0 Gy) and infusional chemotherapy (oxaliplatin 50 mg/m(2)) on the first day of each week, plus five daily continuous infusions of fluorouracil (200 mg/m(2) per die) from the first day of radiation therapy until radiotherapy completion. Patients received five or six cycles of oxaliplatin based on performance status, clinical lymph node involvement, and potential risk of a non-sphincter-conserving surgical procedure. Surgery was planned 7 to 9 wk after the end of radiochemotherapy treatment; adjuvant chemotherapy treatment was left to the oncologist's discretion and was recommended in patients with positive lymph nodes. After treatment, all patients were monitored every three months for the first year and every six months for the subsequent years.
resultsOf the 80 patients enrolled, 75 patients completed the programmed neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy treatment. All patients received the radiotherapy prescribed total dose; five patients suspended chemotherapy indefinitely because of chemotherapy-related toxicity. At least five cycles of oxaliplatin were administered to 73 patients. Treatment was well tolerated with high compliance and a good level of toxicity. Most of the acute toxic effects observed were classified as grades 1-2. Proctitis grade 2 was the most common symptom (63.75%) and the earliest manifestation of acute toxicity. Acute toxicity grades 3-4 was reported in 30% of patients and grade 3 or 4 diarrhoea reported in just three patients (3.75%). Seventy-seven patients underwent surgery; low anterior resection was performed in 52 patients, Miles' surgery in 11 patients and total mesorectal excision in nine patients. Fifty patients showed tumor downsizing ≥ 50% pathological downstaging in 88.00% of tumors. Out of 75 patients surviving surgery, 67 patients (89.33%) had some form of downstaging after preoperative treatment. A pathological complete response was achieved in 23.75% of patients and a nearly pathologic complete response (stage ypT1ypN0) in six patients. An involvement of the radial margin was never present. During surgery, intra-abdominal metastases were found in only one patient (1.25%). Initially, 45 patients required an abdominoperineal resection due to a tumor distal margin ≤ 5 cm from the anal verge. Of these patients, only seven of them underwent Miles' surgery and sphincter preservation was guaranteed in 84.50% of patients in this subgroup. Fourteen patients received postoperative chemotherapy. In the full analysis of enrolled cohort, eight of the 80 patients died, with seven deaths related to rectal cancer and one to unrelated causes. Local recurrences were observed in seven patients (8.75%) and distant metastases in 17 cases (21.25%). The five-year rate of overall survival rate was 90.91%. Using a median follow-up time of 28.5 mo, the cumulative incidence of local recurrences was 8.75%, and the overall survival and disease-free survival rates were 90.00% and 70.00%, respectively.
conclusionThe results of this study suggest oxaliplatin chemotherapy has a beneficial effect on overall survival, likely due to an increase in local tumor control.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.