Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23716405›Full record

ArticleThe American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene2013

Monoclonal antibody-based immunofluorescence microscopy for the rapid identification of Burkholderia pseudomallei in clinical specimens.

Sarunporn Tandhavanant, Gumphol Wongsuvan, Vanaporn Wuthiekanun, Nittaya Teerawattanasook, Nicholas P J Day, Direk Limmathurotsakul, Sharon J Peacock, Narisara Chantratita

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Observational
  3. Review
  4. Laboratory diagnosis of melioidosis.PLoS neglected tropical diseases · 2025
    Review
  5. Identification ofMicrobiology spectrum · 2024
    Article
  6. Burkholderia pseudomallei and melioidosis.Nature reviews. Microbiology · 2024
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Use of RecombinantPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Article
  9. Human Melioidosis.Clinical microbiology reviews · 2020
    Review
  10. Sensitivity and specificity of a lateral flow immunoassay (LFI) in serum samples for diagnosis of melioidosis.Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene · 2018
    Observational
  11. Article
  12. Melioidosis.Nature reviews. Disease primers · 2018
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Susceptibility of Clinical Isolates ofThe American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene · 2017
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Melioidosis diagnostic workshop, 2013.Emerging infectious diseases · 2015
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sarunporn Tandhavanant
Gumphol Wongsuvan
Vanaporn Wuthiekanun
Nittaya Teerawattanasook
Nicholas P J Day
Direk Limmathurotsakul
Sharon J Peacock
Narisara Chantratita
Mahidol University · TH

Funding

Wellcome Trust 087769/Z/08/ZWellcome Trust 089275
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The diagnosis of melioidosis depends on the culture of Burkholderia pseudomallei, which takes at least 48 hours. We used a polyclonal-FITC-based immunofluorescence microscopic assay (Pab-IFA) on clinical samples to provide a rapid presumptive diagnosis. This has limitations including photobleaching and batch-to-batch variability. This study evaluated an IFA based on a monoclonal antibody specific to B. pseudomallei (Mab-IFA) and Alexa Fluor 488. A diagnostic evaluation was performed on a prospective cohort of 951 consecutive patients with suspected melioidosis. A total of 1,407 samples were tested. Test accuracy was defined against culture as the gold standard, and was also compared against Pab-IFA. A total of 88 samples from 64 patients were culture positive for B. pseudomallei. The diagnostic sensitivity and specificity of the Mab-IFA was comparable to the Pab-IFA (48.4% versus 45.3% for sensitivity, and 99.8% versus 98.8% for specificity). We have incorporated the Mab-IFA into our routine practice.

Indexed as

Antibodies, MonoclonalBurkholderia pseudomalleiHumansMelioidosisMicroscopy, FluorescenceProspective StudiesSensitivity and SpecificityAntibodies, Monoclonal

Identifiers

PMID23716405
PMCPMC3748476
OpenAlexW2127681871

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.