ArticleLa Radiologia medica2013
MRI can assess glenoid bone loss after shoulder luxation: inter- and intra-individual comparison with CT.
Article in La Radiologia medica, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
20 citing papers in PubMed, 41 citations in OpenAlex.
- Shoulder instability and associated shoulder injuries in patients with epilepsy.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2026Article
- Comparison of conventional MRI and CT scans for assessing bony parameters and classifying On- and Off-Track lesions in anterior shoulder dislocations.Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery · 2025Article
- Comparison of reliability in two-dimensional computed tomography vs. two-dimensional magnetic resonance imaging for on-track/off-track measurements: analysis of key values for glenohumeral bone loss.JSES international · 2025Article
- Current Methods Used to Evaluate Glenoid Bone Loss: A Survey of Orthopaedic Surgeons.Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine · 2025Article
- Current Concepts in the Measurement of Glenohumeral Bone Loss.Current reviews in musculoskeletal medicine · 2023Review
- Bankart Repair With or Without Concomitant Remplissage Results in Similar Shoulder Motion and Postoperative Outcomes in the Treatment of Shoulder Instability.Arthroscopy, sports medicine, and rehabilitation · 2023Article
- Glenoid bone loss in anterior shoulder dislocation: a multicentric study to assess the most reliable imaging method.La Radiologia medica · 2023Article
- Magnetic Resonance Imaging Versus Computed Tomography for Three-Dimensional Bone Imaging of Musculoskeletal Pathologies: A Review.Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI · 2022Review
- The relationship of glenoid version and severity of glenoid bone loss in anterior shoulder instability patients: A retrospective cohort study.Asia-Pacific journal of sports medicine, arthroscopy, rehabilitation and technology · 2022Article
- Can magnetic resonance imaging accurately and reliably measure humeral cortical thickness?JSES international · 2022Article
- Glenoid Bone Loss in Shoulder Instability: Superiority of Three-Dimensional Computed Tomography over Two-Dimensional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Using Established Methodology.Clinics in orthopedic surgery · 2021Article
- Double-loaded suture anchors in the treatment of anteroinferior glenohumeral instability.JSES international · 2020Article
- Feasibility of using an inversion-recovery ultrashort echo time (UTE) sequence for quantification of glenoid bone loss.Skeletal radiology · 2018Article
- Estimation of anterior glenoid bone loss area using the ratio of bone defect length to the distance from posterior glenoid rim to the centre of the glenoid.Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2018Article
- Outcomes After Arthroscopic Bankart Repair in Adolescent Athletes Participating in Collision and Contact Sports.Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine · 2017Article
- Imaging of the Unstable Shoulder.The open orthopaedics journal · 2017Article
- Mean Glenoid Defect Size and Location Associated With Anterior Shoulder Instability: A Systematic Review.Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine · 2017Article
- Radiographic sclerotic contour loss in the identification of glenoid bone loss.Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2016Article
- Techniques to evaluate glenoid bone loss.Current reviews in musculoskeletal medicine · 2014Article
- Validity of arthroscopic measurement of glenoid bone loss using the bare spot.Open access journal of sports medicine · 2014Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveComputed tomography (CT) is the gold standard for evaluating glenoid bone loss in patients with glenohumeral dislocations. The aim of this study was to verify if magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) can quantify the area of bone loss without any significant difference from CT. MATERIALS AND
methodsTwenty-three patients, who had experienced one or more post-traumatic unilateral glenohumeral dislocations, underwent MRI and CT. MR and multiplanar reconstruction CT images were acquired in the sagittal plane: the glenoid area and the area of bone loss were calculated using the PICO method. Mean values, percentages, Cohen's kappa coefficients and Bland-Altman plots were all used to confirm the working hypothesis.
resultsThe mean glenoid surface area was 575.29 mm(2) as measured by MRI, and 573.76 mm(2) as measured by CT; the calculated mean glenoid bone loss was respectively 4.38% and 4.34%. The interobserver agreement was good (k>0.81), and the coefficient of variance was 5% of the mean value using both methods. The two series of measurements were within two standard deviations of each other.
conclusionsMRI is a valid alternative to CT for measuring glenoid bone loss in patients with glenohumeral dislocation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.