Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23715926›Full record

SynthesisSurgery today2014

Accuracy of sentinel node biopsy in esophageal carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis of the pertinent literature.

Vahid Reza Dabbagh Kakhki, Reza Bagheri, Shahrzad Tehranian, Pardis Shojaei, Hassan Gholami, Ramin Sadeghi, David N Krag

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Surgery today, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Sentinel node navigation surgery in esophageal cancer.Annals of gastroenterological surgery · 2019
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Vahid Reza Dabbagh KakhkiNuclear Medicine Research Center, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.
Reza Bagheri
Shahrzad Tehranian
Pardis Shojaei
Hassan Gholami
Ramin Sadeghi
David N Krag
Mashhad University of Medical Sciences · IRUniversity of Vermont · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The use of sentinel node surgery for esophageal carcinoma is still under investigation. We evaluated the data available in the literature on this topic, and herein present the results in a systematic review format. PUBMED, SCOPUS, the ISI web of knowledge and the information from the annual meetings of the Japan Esophageal Society were searched using the search terms: "(esophagus OR esophageal) AND sentinel". The outcomes of interest were the detection rate and sensitivity. Overall, 18 studies were included. The pooled detection rate was 89.2% [82.6-93.5]. Patients with T1 and two tumors had a 17% higher detection rate compared to those with T3 and four tumors. The pooled sensitivity was 84% [78-88%]. The sensitivity was higher for adenocarcinoma compared to squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) (91 vs. 81%). In the SCC patients, there was a trend toward decreased sensitivity associated with an increasing tumor depth (T1:88%, T2:76%, T3:50%). Our analysis indicated that sentinel node biopsy is useful in adenocarcinoma patients. For SCC patients, including only cN0 patients (preferably T1 and 2) would increase the detection rate and sensitivity. Due to the limited number of high-quality studies, drawing any more definite conclusions is impossible. Large cohort studies with a standardized and consistent design will be needed in the future.

Indexed as

Sentinel Lymph Node BiopsyAdenocarcinomaCarcinoma, Squamous CellEsophageal NeoplasmsFalse Negative ReactionsPubMedSensitivity and SpecificityTumor Stem Cell Assay

Identifiers

PMID23715926
OpenAlexW2149409257

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.