ArticleJournal of computational neuroscience2014
Side peak suppression in responses of an across-frequency integration model to stimuli of varying bandwidth as demonstrated analytically and by implementation.
Article in Journal of computational neuroscience, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Estimating characteristic phase and delay from broadband interaural time difference tuning curves.Journal of computational neuroscience · 2015Article
- Resolution of interaural time differences in the avian sound localization circuit-a modeling study.Frontiers in computational neuroscience · 2014Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Multiplication-like sound localization models are subjected to phase ambiguities for high-frequency tonal stimuli as multiplication creates several equivalent response peaks in tuning curves. By increasing the bandwidth of the stimulus, phase ambiguities can be reduced, which is often referred to as side peak suppression. In this study we present a Jeffress-based sound localization model, and determine side peak suppression analytically. The results were verified with an implementation of the same model, and compared to physiological data of barn owls. Three types of stimuli were analyzed: pure-tone stimuli, two-tone complexes with varying frequency distances, and noise signals with variable bandwidths. As an additional parameter we also determined the half-width of the main response peak to examine the scaling of tuning curves in azimuth. Results showed that side peak suppression did not only depend on bandwidth, but also on the center frequency and the distance of the side peak to the main response peak. In particular, the analytical model predicted that side peak suppression is a function of relative bandwidth, whereas half-width is inversely proportional to center frequency, with a proportionality factor depending on relative bandwidth. The analytical approach and the implementation yielded equivalent tuning curves (deviation < 1%). Moreover, the electrophysiological data recorded in barn owls closely matched the predicted tuning curves.
Indexed as
Identifiers
23715909What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.