ArticlePhotosynthesis research2014
Affinity and activity of non-native quinones at the Q(B) site of bacterial photosynthetic reaction centers.
Article in Photosynthesis research, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Redox potential tuning through differential quinone binding in the photosynthetic reaction center of Rhodobacter sphaeroides.Biochemistry · 2015Article
- The 2-Methoxy Group Orientation Regulates the Redox Potential Difference between the Primary (QThe journal of physical chemistry letters · 2014Article
- Molecular mechanisms for generating transmembrane proton gradients.Biochimica et biophysica actaReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Purple, photosynthetic reaction centers from Rhodobacter sphaeroides bacteria use ubiquinone (UQ10) as both primary (Q(A)) and secondary (Q(B)) electron acceptors. Many quinones reconstitute Q(A) function, while a few will act as Q(B). Nine quinones were tested for their ability to bind and reconstitute Q(A) and Q(B) functions. Only ubiquinone (UQ) reconstitutes both functions in the same protein. The affinities of the non-native quinones for the Q(B) site were determined by a competitive inhibition assay. The affinities of benzoquinones, naphthoquinone (NQ), and 2-methyl-NQ for the Q(B) site are 7 ± 3 times weaker than that at Q(A) site. However, di-ortho-substituted NQs and anthraquinone bind tightly to the Q(A) site (K d ≤ 200 nM), and ≥1,000 times more weakly to the Q(B) site, perhaps setting a limit on the size of the site. With a low-potential electron donor, 2-methyl, 3-dimethylamino-1,4-NQ, (Me-diMeAm-NQ) at Q(A), Q(B) reduction is 260 meV, more favorable than with UQ as Q(A). Electron transfer from Me-diMeAm-NQ at the Q(A) site to NQ at the Q(B) site can be detected. In the Q(B) site, the NQ semiquinone is estimated to be ≈60-100 meV higher in energy than the UQ semiquinone, while in the Q(A) site, the semiquinone energy level is similar or lower with NQ than with UQ. Thus, the NQ semiquinone is more stable in the Q(A) than in the Q(B) site. In contrast, the native UQ semiquinone is ≈60 meV lower in energy in the Q(B) than in the Q(A) site, stabilizing forward electron transfer from Q(A) to Q(B).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.