ArticleInternational journal of clinical pharmacy2013
Comparing effectiveness of two anticoagulation management models in a Malaysian tertiary hospital.
Article in International journal of clinical pharmacy, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 26 citations in OpenAlex.
- American Society of Hematology 2018 guidelines for management of venous thromboembolism: optimal management of anticoagulation therapy.Blood advances · 2018Guideline
- A qualitative exploration of the healthcare challenges and pharmaceutical care needs of people with Parkinson's and their caregivers.International journal of clinical pharmacy · 2022Article
- Stroke Prevention in Atrial Fibrillation: Focus on Asian Patients.Korean circulation journal · 2018Review
- Assessment of oral anticoagulation control at two pharmacist-managed clinics in Brazil.International journal of clinical pharmacy · 2017Observational
- The impact of pharmacy monitoring and intervention in patients receiving intravenous heparin.International journal of clinical pharmacy · 2017Article
- Effect of Standardized Warfarin Treatment Protocol on Anticoagulant Effect: Comparison of a Warfarin Medication Therapy Adherence Clinic with Usual Medical Care.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2017Article
- Pharmacist-managed clinics for patient education and counseling in Japan: current status and future perspectives.Journal of pharmaceutical health care and sciences · 2015Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundsLimited evidence is available regarding pharmacist managed anticoagulation clinic in the Southeast Asian region where there is marked difference in terms of care model, genetic composition and patient demographics.
objectivesThis study aimed at comparing the anticoagulation clinic managed by the pharmacist with physician advisory and the usual medical care provided in Kuala Lumpur Hospital (KLH) in terms of anticoagulation control and adverse outcomes.
settingA 2,302 bedded government tertiary referral hospital in Malaysia.
methodsA 6-month retrospective cohort study of the effectiveness of two models of anticoagulation care, the pharmacist managed anticoagulation clinic which is known as warfarin medication therapy adherence clinic (WMTAC) and usual medical clinic (UMC) in KLH was conducted, where a random number generator was used to recruit patients. The UMC patients received standard medical care where they are managed by rotational medical officers in the physicians' clinic. As for the WMTAC with physician advisory, the pharmacist will counsel and review the patients internationalised normalization ratio at each clinic visit and also adjust the patients' warfarin dose accordingly. Patients are referred to physicians if immediate attention is required.
main outcome measureThe main therapeutic outcome is time in therapeutic range (TTR) both actual and expanded TTR and thromboembolic and bleeding complications.
resultsEach of the WMTAC and usual medical care recruited 92 patients, which totals to 184 patients. The patient demographics in terms of age, race and indication of treatment were comparable. At the end of the 6 months follow-up, patients in the WMTAC group had significantly higher actual-TTR (65.1 vs. 48.3 %; p < 0.05) compared to those in usual medical care group. Rates of admission were 6.5 versus 28.2 events per 100 person-years for the WMTAC and UMC groups, respectively. Though the bleeding incidences were not significantly different, it was reduced.
conclusionsThese findings will impact local warfarin patient management services and policies because there was no available evidence supporting the role of pharmacists in the management of warfarin patients prior to this study.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.