Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23715544›Full record

ArticleDevelopment (Cambridge, England)2013

Tumor suppressors: enhancers or suppressors of regeneration?

Jason H Pomerantz, Helen M Blau

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Development (Cambridge, England), 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 70 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Biophysical control of plasticity and patterning in regeneration and cancer.Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS · 2023
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Unlocking cardiomyocyte renewal potential for myocardial regeneration therapy.Journal of molecular and cellular cardiology · 2023
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. HumanGenes · 2020
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. A Regeneration Toolkit.Developmental cell · 2018
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jason H PomerantzDepartment of Surgery, Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, CA 94143, USA. jason.pomerantz@ucsfmedctr.org
Helen M Blau
Stanford University · USUniversity of California, San Francisco · US

Funding

Progenitor Cell Biology Consortium Administrative Coordinating CenterU01HL099997 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE · PI TERRIN, MICHAEL L · 2009 to 2015
$29.9M
Basic and Translational Research iPSC-based hematologic and vascular therapiesU01HL100397 · NHLBI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI COOKE, JOHN P · 2009 to 2015
$7.4M
Stem Cells for Brain and BrawnR01AG020961 · NIA · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI BLAU, HELEN M · 2002 to 2019
$5.0M
ACTIVATORS OF MUSCLE GENESR01AG009521 · NIA · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI BLAU, HELEN M · 1990 to 2014
$4.7M
Telomere extension using nucleoside-modified mRNA and exosomes as a novel therapeR01AR063963 · NIAMS · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI BLAU, HELEN M · 2012 to 2016
$4.3M
Regulation of Hematopoietic Stem Cell Fate in Bioengineered NichesR01HL096113 · NHLBI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI BLAU, HELEN M · 2009 to 2013
$2.7M
Regulator of Adult Stem Cell FateR01AG024987 · NIA · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI BLAU, HELEN M · 2004 to 2008
$1.7M
Safe, Rapid Telomere Extension to Prevent and Treat HypertensionR21AG044815 · NIA · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI BLAU, HELEN M · 2013 to 2014
$434k
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL096113NHLBI NIH HHS U01 HL099997NHLBI NIH HHS U01 HL100397NIAMS NIH HHS R01 AR063963NIA NIH HHS R01 AG009521NIA NIH HHS R01 AG020961NIA NIH HHS R01 AG024987NIA NIH HHS R21 AG044815
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Tumor suppressors are so named because cancers occur in their absence, but these genes also have important functions in development, metabolism and tissue homeostasis. Here, we discuss known and potential functions of tumor suppressor genes during tissue regeneration, focusing on the evolutionarily conserved tumor suppressors pRb1, p53, Pten and Hippo. We propose that their activity is essential for tissue regeneration. This is in contrast to suggestions that tumor suppression is a trade-off for regenerative capacity. We also hypothesize that certain aspects of tumor suppressor pathways inhibit regenerative processes in mammals, and that transient targeted modification of these pathways could be fruitfully exploited to enhance processes that are important to regenerative medicine.

Indexed as

Gene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticGenes, Tumor SuppressorRegenerationAnimalsApoptosisCell DifferentiationCell ProliferationCyclin-Dependent Kinase Inhibitor p16Disease SusceptibilityDrosophilaDrosophila ProteinsHippo KinasesHumansIntracellular Signaling Peptides and ProteinsMiceMutationCdkn2a protein, mouseCyclin-Dependent Kinase Inhibitor p16Drosophila ProteinsHippo Kinaseshpo protein, DrosophilaIntracellular Signaling Peptides and ProteinsProtein Serine-Threonine KinasesPTEN PhosphohydrolasePten protein, mouseTP53 protein, humanTumor Suppressor Protein p53DifferentiationEvolutionRegenerationTissue homeostasisTumor suppressors

Identifiers

PMID23715544
PMCPMC3666379
OpenAlexW2039270476

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.