Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23715269›Full record

ArticleNature communications2013

Leg-tracking and automated behavioural classification in Drosophila.

Jamey Kain, Chris Stokes, Quentin Gaudry, Xiangzhi Song, James Foley, Rachel Wilson, Benjamin de Bivort

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 43 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
43citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

43 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Future avenues inLearning & memory (Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y.) · 2024
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Motor dysfunction iniScience · 2022
    Article
  8. A Markerless Pose Estimator Applicable to Limbless Animals.Frontiers in behavioral neuroscience · 2022
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Jamey KainRowland Institute, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02142, USA.
Chris Stokes
Quentin Gaudry
Xiangzhi Song
James Foley
Rachel Wilson
Benjamin de Bivort

Funding

Synaptic and Circuit Mechanisms of Olfactory ProcessingR01DC008174 · NIDCD · HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL · PI WILSON, RACHEL · 2006 to 2021
$5.5M
Howard Hughes Medical InstituteNIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC-008174NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC008174
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Much remains unknown about how the nervous system of an animal generates behaviour, and even less is known about the evolution of behaviour. How does evolution alter existing behaviours or invent novel ones? Progress in computational techniques and equipment will allow these broad, complex questions to be explored in great detail. Here we present a method for tracking each leg of a fruit fly behaving spontaneously upon a trackball, in real time. Legs were tracked with infrared-fluorescent dyes invisible to the fly, and compatible with two-photon microscopy and controlled visual stimuli. We developed machine-learning classifiers to identify instances of numerous behavioural features (for example, walking, turning and grooming), thus producing the highest-resolution ethological profiles for individual flies.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsAnimalsAutomationBehavior, AnimalColoring AgentsDrosophila melanogasterEthologyExtremitiesColoring Agents

Identifiers

PMID23715269
PMCPMC3674277

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.