Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23715097›Full record

Trial reportBrain : a journal of neurology2013

The right hemisphere supports but does not replace left hemisphere auditory function in patients with persisting aphasia.

Sundeep Teki, Gareth R Barnes, William D Penny, Paul Iverson, Zoe V J Woodhead, Timothy D Griffiths, Alexander P Leff

Open access · bronzeAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Brain : a journal of neurology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 45 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Echoes of the spoken past: how auditory cortex hears context during speech perception.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2014
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Observational
  5. Effective neural connectivity deficits during speech auditory feedback processing in post-stroke aphasia: An fMRI study.Cortex; a journal devoted to the study of the nervous system and behavior · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Sundeep TekiWellcome Trust Centre for Neuroimaging, University College London, London WC1N 3BG, UK. sundeep.teki.10@ucl.ac.uk
Gareth R Barnes
William D Penny
Paul Iverson
Zoe V J Woodhead
Timothy D Griffiths
Alexander P Leff
University College London · GBNewcastle University · GBWellcome Centre for Human Neuroimaging · GB

Funding

Wellcome Trust 091593Wellcome Trust ME033459MES
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this study, we used magnetoencephalography and a mismatch paradigm to investigate speech processing in stroke patients with auditory comprehension deficits and age-matched control subjects. We probed connectivity within and between the two temporal lobes in response to phonemic (different word) and acoustic (same word) oddballs using dynamic causal modelling. We found stronger modulation of self-connections as a function of phonemic differences for control subjects versus aphasics in left primary auditory cortex and bilateral superior temporal gyrus. The patients showed stronger modulation of connections from right primary auditory cortex to right superior temporal gyrus (feed-forward) and from left primary auditory cortex to right primary auditory cortex (interhemispheric). This differential connectivity can be explained on the basis of a predictive coding theory which suggests increased prediction error and decreased sensitivity to phonemic boundaries in the aphasics' speech network in both hemispheres. Within the aphasics, we also found behavioural correlates with connection strengths: a negative correlation between phonemic perception and an inter-hemispheric connection (left superior temporal gyrus to right superior temporal gyrus), and positive correlation between semantic performance and a feedback connection (right superior temporal gyrus to right primary auditory cortex). Our results suggest that aphasics with impaired speech comprehension have less veridical speech representations in both temporal lobes, and rely more on the right hemisphere auditory regions, particularly right superior temporal gyrus, for processing speech. Despite this presumed compensatory shift in network connectivity, the patients remain significantly impaired.

Indexed as

Acoustic StimulationAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAphasiaAuditory CortexAuditory PerceptionFemaleFunctional LateralityHumansMagnetoencephalographyMaleMiddle AgedStrokeaphasiadynamic causal modellingMEGmismatch negativityspeech

Identifiers

PMID23715097
PMCPMC3673464
OpenAlexW2145911971

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.