Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23714270›Full record

Trial reportTrials2013

Economic support to improve tuberculosis treatment outcomes in South Africa: a pragmatic cluster-randomized controlled trial.

Elizabeth Lutge, Simon Lewin, Jimmy Volmink, Irwin Friedman, Carl Lombard

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Trials, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 45 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
45citing papers in PubMed, 7 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

45 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Nutritional supplements for people being treated for active tuberculosis.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2016
    Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Incentives and enablers to improve adherence in tuberculosis.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2015
    Pooled it
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Patient-centred interventions for drug-resistant tuberculosis: A scoping review.South African family practice : official journal of the South African Academy of Family Practice/Primary Care · 2025
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Implementing active surveillance for tuberculosis: A quality improvement project.South African family practice : official journal of the South African Academy of Family Practice/Primary Care · 2025
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Cash transfers to enhance completion of TB screening among household contacts in rural Tanzania.The international journal of tuberculosis and lung disease : the official journal of the International Union against Tuberculosis and Lung Disease · 2024
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Social Protection Interventions for TB-Affected Households: A Scoping Review.The American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Elizabeth LutgeFaculty of Health Sciences, Stellenbosch University, Francie van Zijl Drive, Tygerberg, 7505, South Africa. elizabethlutge@gmail.com
Simon Lewin
Jimmy Volmink
Irwin Friedman
Carl Lombard

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPoverty undermines adherence to tuberculosis treatment. Economic support may both encourage and enable patients to complete treatment. In South Africa, which carries a high burden of tuberculosis, such support may improve the currently poor outcomes of patients on tuberculosis treatment. The aim of this study was to test the feasibility and effectiveness of delivering economic support to patients with pulmonary tuberculosis in a high-burden province of South Africa.

methodsThis was a pragmatic, unblinded, two-arm cluster-randomized controlled trial, where 20 public sector clinics acted as clusters. Patients with pulmonary tuberculosis in intervention clinics (n = 2,107) were offered a monthly voucher of ZAR120.00 (approximately US$15) until the completion of their treatment. Vouchers were redeemed at local shops for foodstuffs. Patients in control clinics (n = 1,984) received usual tuberculosis care.

resultsIntention to treat analysis showed a small but non-significant improvement in treatment success rates in intervention clinics (intervention 76.2%; control 70.7%; risk difference 5.6% (95% confidence interval: -1.2%, 12.3%), P = 0.107). Low fidelity to the intervention meant that 36.2% of eligible patients did not receive a voucher at all, 32.3% received a voucher for between one and three months and 31.5% received a voucher for four to eight months of treatment. There was a strong dose-response relationship between frequency of receipt of the voucher and treatment success (P <0.001).

conclusionsOur pragmatic trial has shown that, in the real world setting of public sector clinics in South Africa, economic support to patients with tuberculosis does not significantly improve outcomes on treatment. However, the low fidelity to the delivery of our voucher meant that a third of eligible patients did not receive it. Among patients in intervention clinics who received the voucher at least once, treatment success rates were significantly improved. Further operational research is needed to explore how best to ensure the consistent and appropriate delivery of such support to those eligible to receive it.

Indexed as

Medication AdherenceMotivationToken EconomyAdultAntitubercular AgentsDeveloping CountriesFamily CharacteristicsFeasibility StudiesFemaleHumansIntention to Treat AnalysisMalePovertySocioeconomic FactorsSouth AfricaTime FactorsAntitubercular Agents

Identifiers

PMID23714270
PMCPMC3680200

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.