Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23713713›Full record

ReviewClinical genetics2013

Age-related macular degeneration-clinical review and genetics update.

R Ratnapriya, E Y Chew

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Clinical genetics, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 80 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
80citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
13.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

80 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 183 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

20 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

R RatnapriyaNeurobiology-Neurodegeneration and Repair Laboratory, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.
E Y Chew
Institute of Neurobiology · BGNational Institutes of Health · US

Funding

Medical Retina FellowshipZIEEY000487 · NEI · NATIONAL EYE INSTITUTE · PI KEENAN, TIARNAN · 2009 to 2025
$6.6M
AREDS II Ancillary Genetics StudyZIAAT000018 · NCCIH · NATIONAL CENTER FOR COMPLEMENTARY & INTEGRATIVE HEALTH · PI CHEW, EMILY · 2011 to 2013
$237k
Intramural NIH HHS ZIA AT000018
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Age-related macular degeneration (AMD) is the leading cause of central vision impairment in persons over the age of 50 years in developed countries. Both genetic and non-genetic (environmental) factors play major roles in AMD etiology, and multiple gene variants and lifestyle factors such as smoking have been associated with the disease. While dissecting the basic etiology of the disease remains a major challenge, current genetic knowledge has provided opportunities for improved risk assessment, molecular diagnosis and clinical testing of genetic variants in AMD treatment and management. This review addresses the potential of translating the wealth of genetic findings for improved risk prediction and therapeutic intervention in AMD patients. Finally, we discuss the recent advancement in genetics and genomics and the future prospective of personalized medicine in AMD patients.

Indexed as

BiomarkersDisease ProgressionHumansMacular DegenerationPharmacogeneticsPrognosisRisk FactorsBiomarkersage-related macular degenerationdisease managementexome-chipGWASrare-variant associationrisk predictionwhole-exome sequencingwhole-genome sequencing

Identifiers

PMID23713713
PMCPMC3732788
OpenAlexW1822386544

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.