Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23713441›Full record

ArticleEthnicity & health2014

Colorectal cancer among Koreans living in South Korea versus California: incidence, mortality, and screening rates.

So Yeon Ryu, Catherine M Crespi, Annette E Maxwell

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ethnicity & health, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. A Qualitative Analysis of Barriers to Colorectal Cancer Screening among Korean Americans.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2021
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Annual Review of Asian American Psychology, 2014.Asian American journal of psychology · 2015
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

So Yeon Ryua Chosun University Medical School , Gwangju , Republic of Korea.
Catherine M Crespi
Annette E Maxwell
University of California, Los Angeles · US

Funding

Women's CancersP30CA016042 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI Samuel Wheeler French · 1985 to 2026
$134.5M
UCLA Clinical and Translational Science InstituteUL1TR000124 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI DUBINETT, STEVEN M. · 2012 to 2015
$57.0M
Supporting African American Churches to Promote Cancer ScreeningU54CA143931 · NCI · CHARLES R. DREW UNIVERSITY OF MED & SCI · PI VADGAMA, JAYDUTT V. · 2009 to 2022
$19.7M
UCLA/RAND PREVENTION RESEARCH CENTERU48DP001934 · DP · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI BASTANI, ROSHAN · 2009 to 2013
$5.9M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000124NCCDPHP CDC HHS U48DP001934NCI NIH HHS P30 CA016042NCI NIH HHS U54 CA143931
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThis study compared trends in colorectal cancer (CRC) incidence and mortality rates among Koreans in South Korea and Korean Americans and non-Hispanic whites in California between 1999 and 2009, and examined CRC screening rates and socio-demographic correlates of CRC screening in the two Korean populations.

designAge-standardized CRC incidence and mortality rates of Koreans in South Korea and Korean Americans and non-Hispanic whites in California for the years 1999-2009 were obtained from annual reports of cancer statistics and modeled using joinpoint regression. Using 2009 data from the Korean National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey and the California Health Interview Survey, we estimated and compared CRC screening rates and test modalities. We used multiple logistic regression to examine socio-demographic correlates of completion of CRC screening according to the guidelines among the two Korean populations.

resultsCRC incidence and mortality rates among South Koreans increased during 1999-2009 but more slowly during the late 2000s. In California, CRC incidence increased among Korean American females but decreased among non-Hispanic whites. About 37% of South Koreans and 60% of Korean Americans reported completion of CRC screening according to guidelines in 2009. Among South Koreans, married status, higher income, and private health insurance were associated with CRC screening, adjusting for other factors. Among Korean Americans, having health insurance was associated with CRC screening.

conclusionDespite almost identical CRC screening guidelines in South Korea and the USA and substantially higher screening rates among Korean Americans as compared to South Koreans, disparities remain in both populations with respect to CRC statistics. Thus, efforts to promote primary and secondary prevention of CRC in both Korean populations are critically important in both countries.

Indexed as

AgedCaliforniaColorectal NeoplasmsFemaleHealth SurveysHumansIncidenceLogistic ModelsMaleMiddle AgedRepublic of KoreaSex FactorsWhite Peoplecolorectal cancerincidenceKorean Americansmortalityscreeningsocioeconomic disparitiesSouth Koreatrends

Identifiers

PMID23713441
PMCPMC3795980
OpenAlexW1990111255

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.