Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23713107›Full record

SynthesisPediatrics2013

Systematic review of prenatal cocaine exposure and adolescent development.

Stacy Buckingham-Howes, Sarah Shafer Berger, Laura A Scaletti, Maureen M Black

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Pediatrics, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 49 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
49citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

49 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Prenatal drug exposure, behavioral problems, and drug experimentation among African-American urban adolescents.The Journal of adolescent health : official publication of the Society for Adolescent Medicine · 2014
    Trial
  2. Heterogeneity in Callous-Unemotional Traits: Early Temperamental and Environmental Risk Factors in a High-Risk Sample.Clinical psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Stacy Buckingham-HowesDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21201, USA. mblack@peds.umaryland.edu
Sarah Shafer Berger
Laura A Scaletti
Maureen M Black

Funding

Prenatal Drug Exposure: Effects on Adolescent Brain and Behavioral DevelopmentR01DA021059 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE · PI BLACK, MAUREEN M · 2005 to 2009
$3.1M
PROGRAM FOR DRUG ABUSING WOMEN AND THEIR CHILDRENR01DA007432 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE · PI NAIR, PRASANNA · 1991 to 2002
$867k
Prenatal Drug Exposure and Adolescent Drug Use: The Role of HPA Axis RegulationF32DA036274 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE · PI HOWES, STACY · 2013 to 2014
$116k
NIDA NIH HHS F32 DA036274NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA007432NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA021059
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

objectivePrevious research found that prenatal cocaine exposure (PCE) may increase children's vulnerability to behavior and cognition problems. Maturational changes in brain and social development make adolescence an ideal time to reexamine associations. The objective was to conduct a systematic review of published studies examining associations between PCE and adolescent development (behavior, cognition/school outcomes, physiologic responses, and brain morphology/functioning).

methodsArticles were obtained from PubMed, PsycInfo, Web of Science, and CINAHL databases through July 2012 with search terms: prenatal drug, substance, or cocaine exposure; adolescence/adolescent; and in utero substance/drug exposure. Criteria for inclusion were nonexposed comparison group, human adolescents aged 11 to 19, peer-reviewed, English-language, and adolescent outcomes.

resultsTwenty-seven studies representing 9 cohorts met the criteria. Four outcome categories were identified: behavior, cognition/school performance, brain structure/function, and physiologic responses. Eleven examined behavior; 7 found small but significant differences favoring nonexposed adolescents, with small effect sizes. Eight examined cognition/school performance; 6 reported significantly lower scores on language and memory tasks among adolescents with PCE, with varying effect sizes varied. Eight examined brain structure/function and reported morphologic differences with few functional differences. Three examined physiologic responses with discordant findings. Most studies controlled for other prenatal exposures, caregiving environment, and violence exposure; few examined mechanisms.

conclusionsConsistent with findings among younger children, PCE increases the risk for small but significantly less favorable adolescent functioning. Although the clinical importance of differences is often unknown, the caregiving environment and violence exposure pose additional threats. Future research should investigate mechanisms linking PCE with adolescent functioning.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdolescent DevelopmentCocaineCocaine-Related DisordersFemaleHumansPregnancyPrenatal Exposure Delayed EffectsCocaineadolescent developmentprenatal cocaine exposure

Identifiers

PMID23713107
PMCPMC3666107

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.