Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23713030›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of physiology2013

The bioelectrical basis and validity of gastrointestinal extracellular slow wave recordings.

Timothy R Angeli, Peng Du, Niranchan Paskaranandavadivel, Patrick W M Janssen, Arthur Beyder, Roger G Lentle, Ian P Bissett, Leo K Cheng, Gregory O'Grady

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of physiology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 45 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
45citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

45 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Gastric slow-wave morphology in health and disease.Digestive diseases and sciences · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. [A New Paradigm in Diagnosing Functional Gastroduodenal Disorders: High-Resolution Electrogastrography].The Korean journal of gastroenterology = Taehan Sohwagi Hakhoe chi · 2024
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Tracking Gut Motility in Organ and Cultures.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2023
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Gastric ablation as a novel technique for modulating electrical conduction in the in vivo stomach.American journal of physiology. Gastrointestinal and liver physiology · 2021
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Timothy R AngeliG. O'Grady: Auckland Bioengineering Institute, Private Bag 92019, Auckland 1142, New Zealand. ogrady.greg@gmail.com.
Peng Du
Niranchan Paskaranandavadivel
Patrick W M Janssen
Arthur Beyder
Roger G Lentle
Ian P Bissett
Leo K Cheng
Gregory O'Grady

Funding

Realistic models of gastrointestinal bioelectromagnetismR01DK064775 · NIDDK · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI CHENG, LEO · 2004 to 2014
$2.6M
NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK064775NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK64775
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Gastrointestinal extracellular recordings have been a core technique in motility research for a century. However, the bioelectrical basis of extracellular data has recently been challenged by claims that these techniques preferentially assay movement artifacts, cannot reproduce the underlying slow wave kinetics, and misrepresent the true slow wave frequency. These claims motivated this joint experimental-theoretical study, which aimed to define the sources and validity of extracellular potentials. In vivo extracellular recordings and video capture were performed in the porcine jejunum, before and after intra-arterial nifedipine administration. Gastric extracellular recordings were recorded simultaneously using conventional serosal contact and suction electrodes, and biphasic and monophasic extracellular potentials were simulated in a biophysical model. Contractions were abolished by nifedipine, but extracellular slow waves persisted, with unchanged amplitude, downstroke rate, velocity, and downstroke width (P>0.10 for all), at reduced frequency (24% lower; P=0.03). Simultaneous suction and conventional serosal extracellular recordings were identical in phase (frequency and activation-recovery interval), but varied in morphology (monophasic vs. biphasic; downstroke rate and amplitude: P<0.0001). Simulations demonstrated the field contribution of current flow to extracellular potential and quantified the effects of localised depolarisation due to suction pressure on extracellular potential morphology. In sum, these results demonstrate that gastrointestinal extracellular slow wave recordings cannot be explained by motion artifacts, and are of a bioelectrical origin that is highly consistent with the underlying biophysics of slow wave propagation. Motion suppression is shown to be unnecessary as a routine control in in vivo extracellular studies, supporting the validity of the extant gastrointestinal extracellular literature.

Indexed as

Models, BiologicalMyoelectric Complex, MigratingAnimalsCalcium Channel BlockersJejunumNifedipineStomachSwineCalcium Channel BlockersNifedipine

Identifiers

PMID23713030
PMCPMC3784199

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.