Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23712866›Full record

ReviewCell biochemistry and biophysics2013

Deubiquitylating enzymes and DNA damage response pathways.

Xavier Jacq, Mark Kemp, Niall M B Martin, Stephen P Jackson

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cell biochemistry and biophysics, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 54 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
54citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

54 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Deubiquitylating Enzymes in Cancer and Immunity.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2023
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Ubiquitination and Deubiquitination in Oral Disease.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. The role of deubiquitinating enzymes in cancer drug resistance.Cancer chemotherapy and pharmacology · 2020
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. USP7 Is a Master Regulator of Genome Stability.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2020
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Xavier JacqMISSION Therapeutics Ltd, Babraham Research Campus, Cambridge, CB22 3AT, UK. xjacq@missiontherapeutics.com
Mark Kemp
Niall M B Martin
Stephen P Jackson

Funding

Cancer Research UK 11224Cancer Research UK A11224European Research Council 268536Wellcome Trust 092096
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Covalent post-translational modification of proteins by ubiquitin and ubiquitin-like factors has emerged as a general mechanism to regulate myriad intra-cellular processes. The addition and removal of ubiquitin or ubiquitin-like proteins from factors has recently been demonstrated as a key mechanism to modulate DNA damage response (DDR) pathways. It is thus, timely to evaluate the potential for ubiquitin pathway enzymes as DDR drug targets for therapeutic intervention. The synthetic lethal approach provides exciting opportunities for the development of targeted therapies to treat cancer: most tumours have lost critical DDR pathways, and thus rely more heavily on the remaining pathways, while normal tissues are still equipped with all DDR pathways. Here, we review key deubiquitylating enzymes (DUBs) involved in DDR pathways, and describe how targeting DUBs may lead to selective therapies to treat cancer patients.

Indexed as

DNA DamageDNA RepairHumansNeoplasmsOxidative StressTumor Suppressor Protein p53Ubiquitin-Specific ProteasesUbiquitin ThiolesteraseTumor Suppressor Protein p53Ubiquitin-Specific ProteasesUbiquitin Thiolesterase

Identifiers

PMID23712866
PMCPMC3756857

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.