Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23712712›Full record

ArticleJAMA internal medicine2013

Association of patient preferences for participation in decision making with length of stay and costs among hospitalized patients.

Hyo Jung Tak, Gregory W Ruhnke, David O Meltzer

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA internal medicine, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
12.7field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 55 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Frustrated Patients and Fearful Physicians.Journal of general internal medicine · 2017
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Association between Self-Reported Participation in Decision Making and Inpatient Rehabilitation Outcomes.Physical therapy journal of policy, administration, and leadership · 2015
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Hyo Jung TakSection of Hospital Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL 60637, USA.
Gregory W Ruhnke
David O Meltzer
University of Chicago · US

Funding

Research Design, Data, and Analytics CoreP30DK092949 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI Arshiya Ahmed Baig · 2011 to 2026
$10.0M
Hospital Medicine and Economics Centers for Education & Research for TherapeuticsU18HS016967 · AHRQ · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI MELTZER, DAVID O · 2007 to 2010
$4.0M
UC/UIC Comparative Effectiveness Research Institutional Career Development AwardKM1CA156717 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI MELTZER, DAVID O · 2010 to 2010
$2.4M
Research and Mentoring in Cost-effectiveness and Hospital-based Elder CareK24AG031326 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI MELTZER, DAVID O · 2008 to 2012
$906k
AHRQ HHS U18 HS016967AHRQ HHS U18 HS016967-01NCI NIH HHS KM1 CA156717NIA NIH HHS 1 K24 AG031326-01NIA NIH HHS K24 AG031326NIDDK NIH HHS P30 DK092949
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

importancePatient participation in medical decision making has been associated with improved patient satisfaction and health outcomes. However, there is little evidence concerning its effects on resource utilization. Patient participation in medical decision making has been hypothesized to decrease excess utilization but might be expected to increase utilization when other decision makers have incentives to reduce utilization, as under prospective payment systems for hospital care.

objectiveTo examine the relationship between patient preferences for participation in medical decision making and health care utilization among hospitalized patients. DESIGN AND

settingSurvey study in an academic research setting.

participantsA survey that included questions about preferences to receive medical information and to participate in medical decision making was administered to all patients admitted to the University of Chicago Medical Center general internal medicine service between July 1, 2003, and August 31, 2011, and completed by 21,754 (69.6%) of admitted patients. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The survey data were linked with administrative data, including length of stay and total hospitalization costs. We used generalized linear models to measure the association of patient preference for participation in decision making with length of stay and costs.

resultsThe mean length of stay was 5.34 days, and the mean hospitalization costs were $14,576. While 96.3% of patients expressed a desire to receive information about their illnesses and treatment options, 71.1% of patients preferred to leave medical decision making to their physician. Preference to participate in decision making increased with educational level and with private health insurance. Compared with patients who had a strong desire to delegate decisions to their physician, patients who preferred to participate in decision making concerning their care had a 0.26-day (95% CI, 0.06-0.47 day) longer length of stay (P = .01) and $865 (95% CI, $155-$1575) higher total hospitalization costs (P = .02). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Patient preference to participate in decision making concerning their care may be associated with increased resource utilization among hospitalized patients. Variation in patient preference to participate in medical decision making and its effects on costs and outcomes in the presence of varying physician incentives deserve further examination.

Indexed as

Decision MakingInpatientsInternal MedicineAgedChicagoFemaleHealth SurveysHospitalizationHospitals, UniversityHumansLength of StayMaleMiddle AgedPatient AdmissionPatient ParticipationPatient Preference

Identifiers

PMID23712712
PMCPMC4390034
OpenAlexW1992562595

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.