Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23712708›Full record

SynthesisArchives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery2013

Treatment of acute ankle ligament injuries: a systematic review.

Wolf Petersen, Ingo Volker Rembitzki, Andreas Gösele Koppenburg, Andre Ellermann, Christian Liebau, Gerd Peter Brüggemann, Raymond Best

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02609308 (Platelet Rich Plasma and Lateral Ankle Sprain. A Comparative Study), which is not on this map. Cited by 65 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
65citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
15.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02609308 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2015, after this paper: background citation

Platelet Rich Plasma and Lateral Ankle Sprain. A Comparative Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversidad Autonoma de Nuevo LeonRan2015 to 2017Enrolled21ConditionsAnkle InjuriesArmsShort leg cast, Platelet-rich plasma
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

65 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 272 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article

5 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Wolf PetersenDepartment of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, Martin Luther Hospital, Caspar Theyß Strasse 27-31, Grunewald, 14193, Berlin, Germany. w.petersen@mlk-berlin.de
Ingo Volker Rembitzki
Andreas Gösele Koppenburg
Andre Ellermann
Christian Liebau
Gerd Peter Brüggemann
Raymond Best
ARCUS Sports Clinic · DEGerman Sport University Cologne · DEMartin-Luther-Krankenhaus · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLateral ankle sprains are common musculoskeletal injuries.

objectivesThe objective of this study was to perform a systematic literature review of the last 10 years regarding evidence for the treatment and prevention of lateral ankle sprains. DATA SOURCE: Pubmed central, Google scholar. STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: Meta-analysis, prospective randomized trials, English language articles.

interventionsSurgical and non-surgical treatment, immobilization versus functional treatment, different external supports, balance training for rehabilitation, balance training for prevention, braces for prevention.

methodsA systematic search for articles about the treatment of lateral ankle sprains that were published between January 2002 and December 2012.

resultsThree meta-analysis and 19 articles reporting 16 prospective randomized trials could be identified. The main advantage of surgical ankle ligament repair is that objective instability and recurrence rate is less common when compared with non-operative treatment. Balancing the advantages and disadvantages of surgical and non-surgical treatment, we conclude that the majority of grades I, II and III lateral ankle ligament ruptures can be managed without surgery. For non-surgical treatment, long-term immobilization should be avoided. For grade III injuries, however, a short period of immobilization (max. 10 days) in a below knee cast was shown to be advantageous. After this phase, the ankle is most effectively protected against inversion by a semi-rigid ankle brace. Even grades I and II injuries are most effectively treated with a semi-rigid ankle brace. There is evidence that treatment of acute ankle sprains should be supported by a neuromuscular training. Balance training is also effective for the prevention of ankle sprains in athletes with the previous sprains. There is good evidence from high level randomized trials in the literature that the use of a brace is effective for the prevention of ankle sprains.

conclusionBalancing the advantages and disadvantages of surgical and non-surgical treatment, we conclude that the majority of grades I, II and III lateral ankle ligament ruptures can be managed without surgery. The indication for surgical repair should be always made on an individual basis. This systematic review supports a phase adapted non-surgical treatment of acute ankle sprains with a short-term immobilization for grade III injuries followed by a semi-rigid brace. More prospective randomized studies with a longer follow-up are needed to find out what type of non-surgical treatment has the lowest re-sprain rate.

Indexed as

Acute DiseaseAnkle InjuriesHumansLateral Ligament, AnkleProspective StudiesRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicSprains and Strains

Identifiers

PMID23712708
PMCPMC3718986
OpenAlexW2039059284

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.