Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23712681›Full record

ArticleJAMA internal medicine2013

Relationship between the prognostic expectations of seriously ill patients undergoing hemodialysis and their nephrologists.

Melissa W Wachterman, Edward R Marcantonio, Roger B Davis, Robert A Cohen, Sushrut S Waikar, Russell S Phillips, Ellen P McCarthy

Abstract readComparative StudyMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA internal medicine, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 101 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
101citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
16.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

101 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 176 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. The "surprise question" for predicting death in seriously ill patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2017
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Guideline
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. A Randomized Trial of Expanding Choice Sets to Motivate Advance Directive Completion.Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making · 2017
    Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Incidence and Outcomes of Unplanned Intensive Interventions After Common Inpatient Surgeries: A Population-Based Cohort Study.Annals of surgery open : perspectives of surgical history, education, and clinical approaches · 2026
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. External validation of a prognostic model in routine practice for short- and long-term survival in peritoneal dialysis.Peritoneal dialysis international : journal of the International Society for Peritoneal Dialysis · 2026
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Referral and Beyond: Restructuring the Kidney Transplant Process to Support Greater Access in the United States.American journal of kidney diseases : the official journal of the National Kidney Foundation · 2024
    Article

41 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Melissa W WachtermanDivision of General Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA. melissa.wachterman@va.gov
Edward R Marcantonio
Roger B Davis
Robert A Cohen
Sushrut S Waikar
Russell S Phillips
Ellen P McCarthy
Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center · USBrigham and Women's Hospital · USVA Boston Healthcare System · US

Funding

HARVARD CLINICAL AND TRANSLATIONAL SCIENCE CENTER (UL1)UL1RR025758 · NCRR · HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL · PI NADLER, LEE MARSHALL · 2008 to 2011
$91.4M
Mid-Career Mentoring Award for Patient-Oriented Research in AgingK24AG035075 · NIA · BETH ISRAEL DEACONESS MEDICAL CENTER · PI MARCANTONIO, EDWARD R · 2010 to 2021
$1.9M
End-of-life decision making in seriously ill patients: the case of ESRDF32NR012872 · NINR · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI WACHTERMAN, MELISSA · 2011 to 2011
$63k
NCRR NIH HHS UL1 RR 025758NCRR NIH HHS UL1 RR025758NIA NIH HHS K24 AG035075NINR NIH HHS F32 NR012872
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

importancePatients undergoing hemodialysis have an annual mortality rate exceeding 20%, comparable to many types of cancer. Past research has shown that patients with cancer overestimate their likelihood of survival relative to their physicians, but this relationship has not been examined in patients with noncancer diagnoses. Perceptions of prognosis and transplant candidacy may influence goals of care.

objectivesTo compare the perceptions of hemodialysis patients and their nephrologists concerning prognosis and the likelihood of transplant; to follow actual survival; and to explore the relationship between patients' expectations and their goals of care.

designWe completed a medical record abstraction to estimate 1-year mortality risk among patients who underwent dialysis at any time from November 1, 2010, through September 1, 2011. We then conducted in-person interviews with eligible patients whose predicted 1-year mortality, based on validated prognostic tools, was at least 20%. We also interviewed their nephrologists. We compared patients' and physicians' expectations about 1- and 5-year survival and transplant candidacy and measured the association between patients' expectations and goals of care. We then followed actual survival using Kaplan-Meier methods. SETTING AND

participantsTwo dialysis units in Boston. Two hundred seven patients undergoing hemodialysis included in the medical record review, with 62 eligible patients interviewed. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Predicted 1-year mortality risk using validated prognostic tools; actual survival; patients' and physicians' expectations about 1-year survival and likelihood of transplant; and patients' goals of care.

resultsOf the 207 hemodialysis patients, 72.5% had a predicted 1-year mortality of at least 20%. Of the 80 patients eligible for interview, 62 participated (response rate, 78%). Patients were significantly more optimistic than their nephrologists about 1- and 5-year survival (P < .001 for both) and were more likely to think they were transplant candidates (37 [66%] vs 22 [39%] [P = .008]). Of the 81% of patients reporting a 90% chance or greater of being alive at 1 year, 18 (44%) preferred care focused on extending life, even if it meant more discomfort, compared with 1 (9%) among patients reporting a lower chance of survival (P = .045). Actual survival was 93% at 1 year but decreased to 79% by 17 months and 56% by 23 months. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Hemodialysis patients are more optimistic about prognosis and transplant candidacy than their nephrologists. In our sample, patients' expectations about 1-year survival were more accurate than those of their nephrologists, but their longer-term survival expectations dramatically overestimated even their 2-year survival rates. Patients' prognostic expectations are associated with their treatment preferences. Our findings suggest the need for interventions to help providers communicate effectively with patients about prognosis.

Indexed as

NephrologyAcademic Medical CentersBostonHemodialysis Units, HospitalHumansKidney Failure, ChronicKidney TransplantationPhysiciansPrognosisRenal DialysisResearch DesignRisk AssessmentRisk FactorsSurveys and QuestionnairesSurvival Rate

Identifiers

PMID23712681
PMCPMC3982381
OpenAlexW2114562724

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.