ArticleJAMA internal medicine2013
Relationship between the prognostic expectations of seriously ill patients undergoing hemodialysis and their nephrologists.
Article in JAMA internal medicine, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 101 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
101 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 176 citations in OpenAlex.
- The "surprise question" for predicting death in seriously ill patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2017Pooled it
- How long do patients with chronic disease expect to live? A systematic review of the literature.BMJ open · 2016Pooled it
- Executive summary of the KDIGO Controversies Conference on Supportive Care in Chronic Kidney Disease: developing a roadmap to improving quality care.Kidney international · 2015Guideline
- Prediction of the Mortality Risk in Peritoneal Dialysis Patients using Machine Learning Models: A Nation-wide Prospective Cohort in Korea.Scientific reports · 2020Trial
- Use of a Supportive Kidney Care Video Decision Aid in Older Patients: A Randomized Controlled Trial.American journal of nephrology · 2020Trial
- A Randomized Trial of Expanding Choice Sets to Motivate Advance Directive Completion.Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making · 2017Trial
- Rationale and Design of the Randomized Evaluation of Default Access to Palliative Services (REDAPS) Trial.Annals of the American Thoracic Society · 2016Trial
- Incidence and Outcomes of Unplanned Intensive Interventions After Common Inpatient Surgeries: A Population-Based Cohort Study.Annals of surgery open : perspectives of surgical history, education, and clinical approaches · 2026Article
- Randomized Controlled Trial of Integrated Kidney Supportive Care in End-Stage Kidney Disease.Kidney international reports · 2026Article
- Navigating prognostic uncertainty with H.O.P.E.: Caring for elderly patients with chronic kidney disease.Patient education and counseling · 2026Article
- External validation of a prognostic model in routine practice for short- and long-term survival in peritoneal dialysis.Peritoneal dialysis international : journal of the International Society for Peritoneal Dialysis · 2026Article
- Kidney-therapy decision-making among older adults and caregivers: treatment beliefs, prognostic information, and health priorities.BMC nephrology · 2025Article
- Prognostic Preferences of Older Adults on Maintenance Hemodialysis and Their Care Partners: A Qualitative Study.Clinical journal of the American Society of Nephrology : CJASN · 2025Article
- Patient-physician communication in advanced kidney disease: a narrative review.Journal of nephrology · 2025Review
- Experience of Older Adults and Their Family Members in the Kidney Transplant Evaluation.JAMA internal medicine · 2025Article
- Article
- Patient satisfaction with dialysis services provided across different providers in Saudi Arabia.Frontiers in nephrology · 2025Article
- Communicating health risk in chronic kidney disease: a scoping review.Journal of nephrology · 2025Article
- Nephrology providers' perspective and use of mortality prognostic tools in dialysis patients.BMC nephrology · 2024Article
- Referral and Beyond: Restructuring the Kidney Transplant Process to Support Greater Access in the United States.American journal of kidney diseases : the official journal of the National Kidney Foundation · 2024Article
41 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
importancePatients undergoing hemodialysis have an annual mortality rate exceeding 20%, comparable to many types of cancer. Past research has shown that patients with cancer overestimate their likelihood of survival relative to their physicians, but this relationship has not been examined in patients with noncancer diagnoses. Perceptions of prognosis and transplant candidacy may influence goals of care.
objectivesTo compare the perceptions of hemodialysis patients and their nephrologists concerning prognosis and the likelihood of transplant; to follow actual survival; and to explore the relationship between patients' expectations and their goals of care.
designWe completed a medical record abstraction to estimate 1-year mortality risk among patients who underwent dialysis at any time from November 1, 2010, through September 1, 2011. We then conducted in-person interviews with eligible patients whose predicted 1-year mortality, based on validated prognostic tools, was at least 20%. We also interviewed their nephrologists. We compared patients' and physicians' expectations about 1- and 5-year survival and transplant candidacy and measured the association between patients' expectations and goals of care. We then followed actual survival using Kaplan-Meier methods. SETTING AND
participantsTwo dialysis units in Boston. Two hundred seven patients undergoing hemodialysis included in the medical record review, with 62 eligible patients interviewed. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Predicted 1-year mortality risk using validated prognostic tools; actual survival; patients' and physicians' expectations about 1-year survival and likelihood of transplant; and patients' goals of care.
resultsOf the 207 hemodialysis patients, 72.5% had a predicted 1-year mortality of at least 20%. Of the 80 patients eligible for interview, 62 participated (response rate, 78%). Patients were significantly more optimistic than their nephrologists about 1- and 5-year survival (P < .001 for both) and were more likely to think they were transplant candidates (37 [66%] vs 22 [39%] [P = .008]). Of the 81% of patients reporting a 90% chance or greater of being alive at 1 year, 18 (44%) preferred care focused on extending life, even if it meant more discomfort, compared with 1 (9%) among patients reporting a lower chance of survival (P = .045). Actual survival was 93% at 1 year but decreased to 79% by 17 months and 56% by 23 months. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Hemodialysis patients are more optimistic about prognosis and transplant candidacy than their nephrologists. In our sample, patients' expectations about 1-year survival were more accurate than those of their nephrologists, but their longer-term survival expectations dramatically overestimated even their 2-year survival rates. Patients' prognostic expectations are associated with their treatment preferences. Our findings suggest the need for interventions to help providers communicate effectively with patients about prognosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.