Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23712450›Full record

ArticleAnnals of botany2013

An invasive Mimosa in India does not adopt the symbionts of its native relatives.

Hukam Singh Gehlot, Nisha Tak, Muskan Kaushik, Shubhajit Mitra, Wen-Ming Chen, Nicole Poweleit, Dheeren Panwar, Neetu Poonar, Rashmita Parihar, Alkesh Tak and 11 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of botany, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
14.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 104 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Biochemistry and biophysics reports · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. A rhamnose-rich O-antigen ofJournal of bacteriology · 2025
    Article
  6. The alien ACommunicative & integrative biology · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Genomic Diversity of Pigeon Pea (Frontiers in plant science · 2021
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Specificity in Legume-Rhizobia Symbioses.International journal of molecular sciences · 2017
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors at 10 institutions in 6 countries.

Hukam Singh GehlotBNF and Stress Biology Lab., Department of Botany, J.N. Vyas University, Jodhpur-342001, India.
Nisha Tak
Muskan Kaushik
Shubhajit Mitra
Wen-Ming Chen
Nicole Poweleit
Dheeren Panwar
Neetu Poonar
Rashmita Parihar
Alkesh Tak
Indu Singh Sankhla
Archana Ojha
Satyawada Rama Rao
Marcelo F Simon
Fabio Bueno Dos Reis Junior
Natalia Perigolo
Anil K Tripathi
Janet I Sprent
J Peter W Young
Euan K James
Prasad Gyaneshwar
Jai Narain Vyas University · INUniversity of Wisconsin–Milwaukee · USBrazilian Agricultural Research Corporation · BRNorth Eastern Hill University · INBanaras Hindu University · INJames Hutton Institute · GBNational Kaohsiung Marine University · TWUniversidade de Brasília · BRUniversity of Dundee · GBUniversity of York · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

aimsThe large monophyletic genus Mimosa comprises approx. 500 species, most of which are native to the New World, with Central Brazil being the main centre of radiation. All Brazilian Mimosa spp. so far examined are nodulated by rhizobia in the betaproteobacterial genus Burkholderia. Approximately 10 Mya, transoceanic dispersal resulted in the Indian subcontinent hosting up to six endemic Mimosa spp. The nodulation ability and rhizobial symbionts of two of these, M. hamata and M. himalayana, both from north-west India, are here examined, and compared with those of M. pudica, an invasive species.

methodsNodules were collected from several locations, and examined by light and electron microscopy. Rhizobia isolated from them were characterized in terms of their abilities to nodulate the three Mimosa hosts. The molecular phylogenetic relationships of the rhizobia were determined by analysis of 16S rRNA, nifH and nodA gene sequences. KEY

resultsBoth native Indian Mimosa spp. nodulated effectively in their respective rhizosphere soils. Based on 16S rRNA, nifH and nodA sequences, their symbionts were identified as belonging to the alphaproteobacterial genus Ensifer, and were closest to the 'Old World' Ensifer saheli, E. kostiensis and E. arboris. In contrast, the invasive M. pudica was predominantly nodulated by Betaproteobacteria in the genera Cupriavidus and Burkholderia. All rhizobial strains tested effectively nodulated their original hosts, but the symbionts of the native species could not nodulate M. pudica.

conclusionsThe native Mimosa spp. in India are not nodulated by the Burkholderia symbionts of their South American relatives, but by a unique group of alpha-rhizobial microsymbionts that are closely related to the 'local' Old World Ensifer symbionts of other mimosoid legumes in north-west India. They appear not to share symbionts with the invasive M. pudica, symbionts of which are mostly beta-rhizobial.

Indexed as

Introduced SpeciesSymbiosisAgricultural InoculantsAlphaproteobacteriaBiodiversityBurkholderiaCupriavidusGenes, BacterialIndiaMimosaPhylogenyPlant RootsRhizobiumRNA, Ribosomal, 16SSouth AmericaRNA, Ribosomal, 16Sarid regionsbacterial symbiontsBetaproteobacteriaBurkholderiaCupriavidusEnsiferMimosa hamataMimosa himalayanaMimosa pudicanitrogen fixationnodulationrhizobiaThar Desert

Identifiers

PMID23712450
PMCPMC3690997
OpenAlexW2133236440

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.