Trial reportAnnals of nuclear medicine2013
Impaired renal function is a major determinant of left ventricular diastolic dysfunction: assessment by stress myocardial perfusion imaging.
Trial report in Annals of nuclear medicine, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Diastolic Dysfunction and Renal Disease: Analysis, Mechanisms, and Different Perspectives.Cureus · 2025Review
- Kidney and heart failure events are bidirectionally associated in patients with type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular disease.ESC heart failure · 2024Article
- The diastolic function abnormalities in hemodialysis session: a two-dimensional speckle tracking echocardiographic (2DSTE) study.The international journal of cardiovascular imaging · 2022Article
- Renal function monitoring in heart failure - what is the optimal frequency? A narrative review.British journal of clinical pharmacology · 2018Review
- Association between suPAR and cardiac diastolic dysfunction among patients with preserved ejection fraction.Heart and vessels · 2017Article
- Heart function disturbances in chronic kidney disease - echocardiographic indices.Archives of medical science : AMS · 2014Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveRelationships between myocardial scintigraphic parameters and renal function have not been fully determined. We investigated correlations between estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and left ventricular (LV) diastolic function using stress electrocardiographic (ECG)-gated myocardial single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT).
methodsWe enrolled 136 consecutive patients with suspected coronary artery disease (CAD) who were assessed using technetium-99m stress ECG-gated myocardial SPECT. We evaluated SPECT images using 17-segment defect scores graded on a 5-point scale, summed stress score, summed rest score and summed difference score (SDS). The parameters for assessing LV diastolic function were peak filling rate (PFR), 1/3 mean filling rate and time to peak filling. The CAD was defined as SDS ≥2. Chronic kidney disease (CKD) was defined as eGFR <60 mL/min/1.73 m(2). Patients were assigned to the following four groups (no CAD/no CKD: control group, n = 68; CAD/no CKD: CAD group, n = 24; no CAD/CKD: CKD group, n = 34; CAD/CKD: CAD + CKD group, n = 10).
resultsThe PFR was significantly impaired after stress in the CKD and CAD + CKD groups compared with controls (p < 0.001 for both). Furthermore, PFR at rest positively correlated with eGFR (r = 0.29, p < 0.001) and inversely correlated with SDS (r = -0.18, p < 0.05). Multivariate stepwise regression analysis independently associated eGFR with PFR (β coefficient = 0.260, p = 0.002).
conclusionsOur data suggest that impaired renal function is a significant determinant of LV diastolic dysfunction in patients with suspected CAD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.