Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23711998›Full record

Trial reportDrug and alcohol dependence2013

Computer and therapist based brief interventions among cannabis-using adolescents presenting to primary care: one year outcomes.

Maureen A Walton, Kipling Bohnert, Stella Resko, Kristen L Barry, Stephen T Chermack, Robert A Zucker, Marc A Zimmerman, Brenda M Booth, Frederic C Blow

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Drug and alcohol dependence, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 42 papers, 8 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
42citing papers in PubMed, 8 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

42 citing papers in PubMed, 8 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Brief Drug Interventions Delivered in General Medical Settings: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Cannabis Use Outcomes.Prevention science : the official journal of the Society for Prevention Research · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Psychological Interventions for Cannabis Use among Adolescents and Young Adults: A Systematic Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Research in the Integration of Behavioral Health for Adolescents and Young Adults in Primary Care Settings: A Systematic Review.The Journal of adolescent health : official publication of the Society for Adolescent Medicine · 2017
    Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Intervention for marijuana using, court-involved non-incarcerated youth.Journal of substance use and addiction treatment · 2023
    Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Pediatrician and Behavioral Clinician-Delivered Screening, Brief Intervention and Referral to Treatment: Substance Use and Depression Outcomes.The Journal of adolescent health : official publication of the Society for Adolescent Medicine · 2018
    Trial
  17. Trial
  18. Trial
  19. Trial
  20. Trial
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Maureen A WaltonUniversity of Michigan, Department of Psychiatry, Ann Arbor, MI, USA. Electronic address: waltonma@med.umich.edu.
Kipling Bohnert
Stella Resko
Kristen L Barry
Stephen T Chermack
Robert A Zucker
Marc A Zimmerman
Brenda M Booth
Frederic C Blow

Funding

Tailored Youth Drug Intervention in Primary CareR01DA020075 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI BLOW, FREDERIC C · 2005 to 2009
$3.0M
NIDA NIH HHS DA020075NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA020075
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsThis paper describes outcomes from a randomized controlled trial examining the efficacy of brief interventions delivered by a computer (CBI) or therapist (TBI) among adolescents in urban primary care clinics.

methodsPatients (ages 12-18) self-administered a computer survey. Adolescents reporting past year cannabis use completed a baseline survey and were randomized to control, CBI or TBI, with primary (cannabis use, cannabis related consequences - CC) and secondary outcomes [alcohol use, other drug use (illicit and non-medical prescription drugs), and driving under the influence of cannabis (DUI)] assessed at 3, 6, and 12 months.

results1416 adolescents were surveyed; 328 reported past year cannabis use and were randomized. Comparisons of the CBI relative to control showed that at 3 months the group by time interaction (G × T) was significant for other drug use and CC, but not for cannabis use, alcohol use, or DUI; at 6 months, the G × T interaction was significant for other drug use but not for cannabis use, alcohol use, or CC. For analyses comparing the TBI to control, at 3 months the G×T interaction was significant for DUI, but not significant for cannabis use, alcohol use, or CC; at 6 months, the G×T interaction was not significant for any variable. No significant intervention effects were observed at 12 months.

conclusionAmong adolescent cannabis users presenting to primary care, a CBI decreased cannabis related problems and other drug use and a TBI decreased cannabis DUI in the short-term. Additional boosters may be necessary to enhance these reductions over time.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdolescent BehaviorChildData CollectionFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleMarijuana AbusePrimary Health CareTherapy, Computer-AssistedTreatment OutcomeAdolescentBrief interventionCannabisComputerPrimary care

Identifiers

PMID23711998
PMCPMC3770780

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.