Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23711627›Full record

ArticleThe American journal of gastroenterology2013

Defining the accuracy of secretin pancreatic function testing in patients with suspected early chronic pancreatitis.

Gyanprakash Ketwaroo, Alphonso Brown, Benjamin Young, Rakhi Kheraj, Mandeep Sawhney, Koenraad J Mortele, Robert Najarian, Sumeet Tewani, Deborah Dasilva, Steven Freedman and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The American journal of gastroenterology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. Academic Pancreas Centers of Excellence: Guidance from a multidisciplinary chronic pancreatitis working group at PancreasFest.Pancreatology : official journal of the International Association of Pancreatology (IAP) ... [et al.]
    Guideline
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Managing chronic pancreatitis: the view from medical pancreatology.The American journal of gastroenterology · 2018
    Article
  11. Chronic Pancreatitis: What the Clinician Wants to Know from MR Imaging.Magnetic resonance imaging clinics of North America · 2018
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Pancreatic Disorders.Pediatric clinics of North America · 2017
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Gyanprakash KetwarooDivision of Gastroenterology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA. gketwaro@bidmc.harvard.edu
Alphonso Brown
Benjamin Young
Rakhi Kheraj
Mandeep Sawhney
Koenraad J Mortele
Robert Najarian
Sumeet Tewani
Deborah Dasilva
Steven Freedman
Sunil Sheth

Funding

RESEARCH TRAINING IN GASTROENTEROLOGYT32DK007760 · NIDDK · BETH ISRAEL DEACONESS MEDICAL CENTER · PI KELLY, CIARAN P · 1999 to 2019
$4.6M
NIDDK NIH HHS T32 DK007760
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThe diagnosis of chronic pancreatitis in patients with characteristic symptoms but normal pancreatic imaging is challenging. Assessment of pancreatic function through secretin pancreatic function testing (SPFT) has been advocated in this setting, but its diagnostic accuracy is not fully known.

methodsThis was a retrospective review of patients who received SPFT at our tertiary care institution between January 1995 and December 2008 for suspected chronic pancreatitis. For all patients, medical records were reviewed for evidence of subsequent development of chronic pancreatitis by imaging and/or pathology. Patients were then categorized as "true positive" or "true negative" for chronic pancreatitis based on follow-up imaging or histologic evidence.

resultsIn all, 116 patients underwent SPFT. Of the 27 patients who tested positive, 7 were lost to follow-up. Of the remaining 20 SPFT-positive patients, 9 (45%) developed radiologic or histologic evidence of chronic pancreatitis after a median of 4 years (1-11 years). Of the 89 patients who had negative SPFT testing, 19 were lost to follow-up. Of the remaining 70 patients, 2 were eventually diagnosed with chronic pancreatitis based on subsequent imaging/histology after a median follow-up period of 7 years (3-11 years). The sensitivity of the SPFT in diagnosing chronic pancreatitis was 82% with a specificity of 86%. The positive predictive value (PPV) of chronic pancreatitis was 45% with a negative predictive value (NPV) of 97%.

conclusionsIn patients with suspected early chronic pancreatitis and normal pancreatic imaging, SPFT is highly accurate at ruling out early chronic pancreatitis with a NPV of 97%.

Indexed as

SecretinAdultChronic DiseaseDiagnosis, DifferentialDiagnostic ImagingEarly DiagnosisFemaleHumansMalePancreatic Function TestsPancreatitis, ChronicPredictive Value of TestsRetrospective StudiesSensitivity and SpecificitySecretin

Identifiers

PMID23711627
PMCPMC5388854

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.