ReviewAmerican journal of rhinology & allergy
Chapter 17: Immunomodulation of allergic sinonasal disease.
Review in American journal of rhinology & allergy. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Chapter 16: Determining the role of allergy in sinonasal disease.American journal of rhinology & allergyReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
IgE hypersensitivity is important to the pathogenesis of allergic diseases and the development and persistence of airway inflammation. Allergic immunomodulation encompasses various therapies that attempt to suppress or modify the immune mechanisms responsible for IgE-mediated disease. These include allergy immunotherapy (AIT) in the forms of subcutaneous immunotherapy (SCIT) and sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT), as well as the emergence of biological agents, such as anti-IgE, for allergic respiratory disease. Clinical evidence strongly supports the efficacy and safety of AIT for the treatment of allergic rhinitis, allergic conjunctivitis, and allergic asthma, but for chronic rhinosinusitis evidence is lacking. In allergic rhinitis, the decision to initiate AIT depends on the degree to which symptoms can be reduced by avoidance and medication, the amount and type of medication required to control symptoms, the adverse effects of medication, the severity and duration of symptoms, and their effect on quality of life. AIT has the potential to produce sustained long-lasting immune modulation and possibly avoid or reduce lifelong requirements for medical therapy. Although SLIT is currently being evaluated, SCIT remains the preferred form of AIT in the United States because of robust efficacy data, availability of allergen extracts, and current Food and Drug Administration approval. However, SLIT holds the potential for greater patient safety and convenience. Other immunomodulators such as anti-IgE also hold promise, but require further investigation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.