Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23709367›Full record

ArticleJournal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract2013

Pre-therapy laparoscopic feeding jejunostomy is safe and effective in patients undergoing minimally invasive esophagectomy for cancer.

Kfir Ben-David, Tad Kim, Angel M Caban, Georgios Rossidis, Sara S Rodriguez, Steven N Hochwald

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 44 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Laparoscopic Witzel feeding jejunostomy: a procedure overlooked!Journal of minimally invasive surgery · 2023
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Impact of regular enteral feedingWorld journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2019
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Clinical Burden of Laparoscopic Feeding Jejunostomy Tubes.Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract · 2016
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Laparoscopic distal, subtotal gastrectomy for advanced gastric cancer.Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract · 2015
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Kfir Ben-DavidDepartment of Surgery, College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32610-0109, USA. kfir.bendavid@surgery.ufl.edu
Tad Kim
Angel M Caban
Georgios Rossidis
Sara S Rodriguez
Steven N Hochwald
University of Florida · USFlorida College · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveLaparoscopic feeding jejunostomy is a safe and effective means of providing enteral nutrition in the preoperative phase to esophageal cancer patients.

designThis research is a retrospective case series.

settingThis study was conducted in a university tertiary care center. PATIENTS: Between August 2007 and April 2012, 153 laparoscopic feeding jejunostomies were performed in patients 10 weeks prior to their definitive minimally invasive esophagectomy.

main outcome measuresThe outcome is measured based on the technique, safety, and feasibility of a laparoscopic feeding jejunostomy in the preoperative phase of esophageal cancer patients.

resultsOne hundred fifty-three patients underwent a laparoscopic feeding jejunostomy approximately 1 and 10 week(s) prior to the start of their neoadjuvant therapy and definitive minimally invasive esophagectomy, respectively. Median age was 63 years. Of the patients, 75 % were males and 25 % were females. One hundred twenty-seven patients had gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma and 26 had squamous cell carcinoma. All patients completed their neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy. The median operative time was 65 min. We had no intraoperative complications, perforation, postoperative bowel necrosis, bowel torsion, herniation, intraperitoneal leak, or mortality as a result of the laparoscopic feeding jejunostomy. Four patients were noted to have superficial skin infection around the tube, and 11 patients required a tube exchange for dislodgment, clogging, and leaking around the tube. All patients progressed to their definitive surgical esophageal resection.

conclusionA laparoscopic feeding jejunostomy is technically feasible, safe, and can provide appropriate enteral nutrition in the preoperative phase of esophageal cancer patients.

Indexed as

Enteral NutritionJejunostomyPreoperative CareAdenocarcinomaCarcinoma, Squamous CellChemoradiotherapy, AdjuvantEquipment FailureEsophageal NeoplasmsEsophagectomyFemaleHumansLaparoscopyMaleMiddle AgedNeoadjuvant TherapyRetrospective Studies

Identifiers

PMID23709367
OpenAlexW2063427970

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.