Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23709166›Full record

ArticleBehavior research methods2013

The development and analysis of tutorial dialogues in AutoTutor Lite.

Christopher R Wolfe, Colin L Widmer, Valerie F Reyna, Xiangen Hu, Elizabeth M Cedillos, Christopher R Fisher, Priscilla G Brust-Renck, Triana C Williams, Isabella Damas Vannucchi, Audrey M Weil

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Behavior research methods, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
7.0field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Understanding Genetic Breast Cancer Risk: Processing Loci of theLearning and individual differences · 2016
    Article
  6. Efficacy of a web-based intelligent tutoring system for communicating genetic risk of breast cancer: a fuzzy-trace theory approach.Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making · 2015
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Christopher R WolfeMiami University, Oxford, OH 45056, USA. WolfeCR@MiamiOH.edu
Colin L Widmer
Valerie F Reyna
Xiangen Hu
Elizabeth M Cedillos
Christopher R Fisher
Priscilla G Brust-Renck
Triana C Williams
Isabella Damas Vannucchi
Audrey M Weil
Miami University · USCornell University · USUniversity of Memphis · US

Funding

The Gist of Hot and Cold Cognition in Adolescents Risky Decision MakingR01NR014368 · NINR · CORNELL UNIVERSITY · PI REYNA, VALERIE FRANCES · 2012 to 2014
$1.8M
A Web Tutor to Help Women Decide About Testing for Genetic Breast Cancer RiskR21CA149796 · NCI · MIAMI UNIVERSITY OXFORD · PI REYNA, VALERIE FRANCES, WOLFE, CHRISTOPHER R · 2011 to 2012
$364k
NCI NIH HHS R21 CA149796NCI NIH HHS R21CA149796NINR NIH HHS R01 NR014368
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The goal of intelligent tutoring systems (ITS) that interact in natural language is to emulate the benefits that a well-trained human tutor provides to students, by interpreting student answers and appropriately responding in order to encourage elaboration. BRCA Gist is an ITS developed using AutoTutor Lite, a Web-based version of AutoTutor. Fuzzy-trace theory theoretically motivated the development of BRCA Gist, which engages people in tutorial dialogues to teach them about genetic breast cancer risk. We describe an empirical method to create tutorial dialogues and fine-tune the calibration of BRCA Gist's semantic processing engine without a team of computer scientists. We created five interactive dialogues centered on pedagogic questions such as "What should someone do if she receives a positive result for genetic risk of breast cancer?" This method involved an iterative refinement process of repeated testing with different texts and successively making adjustments to the tutor's expectations and settings in order to improve performance. The goal of this method was to enable BRCA Gist to interpret and respond to answers in a manner that best facilitated learning. We developed a method to analyze the efficacy of the tutor's dialogues. We found that BRCA Gist's assessment of participants' answers was highly correlated with the quality of the answers found by trained human judges using a reliable rubric. The dialogue quality between users and BRCA Gist predicted performance on a breast cancer risk knowledge test completed after exposure to the tutor. The appropriateness of BRCA Gist's feedback also predicted the quality of answers and breast cancer risk knowledge test scores.

Indexed as

Fuzzy LogicHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeNatural Language ProcessingBreast NeoplasmsComputer-Assisted InstructionDecision Making, Computer-AssistedEducational MeasurementFemaleGenetic TestingHumansInternetPatient Education as TopicReproducibility of ResultsRisk AssessmentSemanticsUser-Computer Interface

Identifiers

PMID23709166
PMCPMC3748232
OpenAlexW1995522504

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.