Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23709098›Full record

ArticleQuality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation2014

A conceptual model of health-related quality of life in sarcoidosis.

David E Victorson, David Cella, Heidi Grund, Marc A Judson

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03510117 (Creating and Optimizing Mindfulness Measures to Enhance and Normalize Clinical Evaluation), which is not on this map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03510117 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2017, after this paper: background citation

Creating and Optimizing Mindfulness Measures to Enhance and Normalize Clinical Evaluation (COMMENCE)

TypeinterventionalSponsorNorthwestern UniversityRan2017 to 2022Enrolled8,152ConditionsMindfulnessArmsMindfulness
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. The effects of pharmacological interventions on quality of life and fatigue in sarcoidosis: a systematic review.European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2020
    Pooled it
  2. Understanding data visualization techniques in qualitative studies used to develop and validate patient-reported outcome measures: a targeted literature review.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2025
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Comprehensive Care for Patients with Sarcoidosis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2020
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Treatment of Sarcoidosis.Clinical reviews in allergy & immunology · 2015
    Review
  10. The Clinical Features of Sarcoidosis: A Comprehensive Review.Clinical reviews in allergy & immunology · 2015
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Development and testing of item response theory-based item banks and short forms for eye, skin and lung problems in sarcoidosis.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2014
    Article
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

David E VictorsonDepartment of Medical Social Sciences, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA, d-victorson@northwestern.edu.
David Cella
Heidi Grund
Marc A Judson

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeSarcoidosis is a multisystem disease that commonly affects the lung, eye, skin, and lymphatic systems. Organ function has been a major focus of treatment outcome with less attention given to more subjective impacts, such as health-related quality of life (HRQL). The purpose of this paper is to present a conceptual model of HRQL in sarcoidosis, which was developed through patient and clinician input.

methodsWe surveyed sarcoidosis clinical experts (n = 5) regarding disease-specific symptoms and their impact on their patient's lives. We also conducted three sarcoidosis patient focus groups (n = 22) that reflected major sarcoidosis typologies (lung, skin, and eye). Data were coded and summarized using qualitative methodologies.

resultsClinicians highlighted the following domains as being important (relative frequencies for comments are in parentheses): emotional distress (17%), lung problems (14%), pain (14%), physical limitations (14%), fatigue (10%), social limitations (10%), eye problems (7%), skin problems (7%), sleep disturbance (3%), and constitutional symptoms (3%). Similarly, patients highlighted the following domains: social limitations (14%), skin problems (12%), pain (10%), coping (10%), emotional distress (9%), lung problems (8%), eye problems (7%), negative impact of corticosteroids (7%), physical limitations (6%), fatigue (6%), sleep disturbance (3%), constitutional symptoms (2%), comorbidities (2%), other systems affected (2%), environmental factors (1%), and positive impact of corticosteroids (1%).

conclusionsClinician and patient responses overlapped in several domains, including emotional distress, physical and social limitations, and sarcoidosis-specific impacts, such as eye, skin, and lung problems. These findings support the HRQL impact of sarcoidosis and provide the basis for a conceptual model which has the potential to inform new patient-reported outcomes measures for this population.

Indexed as

Quality of LifeSickness Impact ProfileAdultAgedChronic DiseaseClinical CompetenceComorbidityFemaleFocus GroupsHumansMaleMedicineMiddle AgedModels, TheoreticalSarcoidosisTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.