Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23708840›Full record

ArticleThe European physical journal. E, Soft matter2013

Mechanisms and constraints shaping the evolution of body plan segmentation.

K H W J Ten Tusscher

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in The European physical journal. E, Soft matter, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Modelling the evolution of novelty: a review.Essays in biochemistry · 2022
    Article
  2. Dynamical systems approach to evolution-development congruence: Revisiting Haeckel's recapitulation theory.Journal of experimental zoology. Part B, Molecular and developmental evolution · 2022
    Review
  3. Time and space in segmentation.Interface focus · 2021
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Dynamics of growth zone patterning in the milkweed bugDevelopment (Cambridge, England) · 2017
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Ancient role ofHereditas · 2017
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Brain evolution by brain pathway duplication.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2015
    Review
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

K H W J Ten TusscherTheoretical Biology and Bioinformactics Group, Utrecht University, Padualaan 8, 3584, CH Utrecht, The Netherlands. K.H.W.J.tenTusscher@uu.nl

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Segmentation of the major body axis into repeating units is arguably one of the major inventions in the evolution of animal body plan pattering. It is found in current day vertebrates, annelids and arthropods. Most segmented animals seem to use a clock-and-wavefront type mechanism in which oscillations emanating from a posterior growth zone become transformed into an anterior posterior sequence of segments. In contrast, few animals such as Drosophila use a complex gene regulatory hierarchy to simultaneously subdivide their entire body axis into segments. Here I discuss how in silico models simulating the evolution of developmental patterning can be used to investigate the forces and constraints that helped shape these two developmental modes. I perform an analysis of a series of previous simulation studies, exploiting the similarities and differences in their outcomes in relation to model characteristics to elucidate the circumstances and constraints likely to have been important for the evolution of sequential and simultaneous segmentation modes. The analysis suggests that constraints arising from the involved growth process and spatial patterning signal--posterior elongation producing a propagating wavefront versus a tissue wide morphogen gradient--and the evolutionary history--ancestral versus derived segmentation mode--strongly shaped both segmentation mechanisms. Furthermore, this implies that these patterning types are to be expected rather than random evolutionary outcomes and supports the likelihood of multiple parallel evolutionary origins.

Indexed as

Evolution, MolecularAnimalsBody PatterningDrosophilaGenes, InsectModels, Genetic

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.