Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23708761›Full record

ArticlePediatric nephrology (Berlin, Germany)2013

Late steroid resistance in childhood nephrotic syndrome: do we now know more than 40 years ago?

Oleh M Akchurin, Frederick J Kaskel

Abstract readEditorialComment
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Pediatric nephrology (Berlin, Germany), 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 32% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Oleh M Akchurin
Frederick J Kaskel
Albert Einstein College of Medicine · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The formation of steroid resistance in children with nephrotic syndrome (NS) who were initially steroid responsive was described decades ago but has not been studied in sufficient depth. Except for the International Study of Kidney Disease in Children, conducted more than three decades ago, when only cyclophosphamide was available as a second-line agent in steroid-resistant NS, only a handful of small studies have addressed the problem of late steroid resistance (LSR) over the past 40 years. Epidemiology and risk factors for the formation of LSR and differences in outcomes when compared with initial steroid resistance still remain unknown. While multiple second-line treatment choices (calcineurin inhibitors, mycophenolate mofetil, rituximab) exist today, therapeutic approaches to the patients with LSR remain empirical, as no evidence-based data have become available. In the current issue of Pediatric Nephrology, Straatmann et al. report retrospective data on the treatment outcomes for 29 pediatric NS patients with LSR from eight participating centers of the Midwest Pediatric Research Consortium. The authors describe a current pattern of second-line agents used in their cohort and show that the majority of patients (66 %) achieved complete or partial remission after a period of observation for 85 ± 47 months. The authors also describe the data on renal histology. While these data represent an important step forward in our understanding of LSR, further work is needed before firm clinical recommendations can be made. Large-scale prospective studies are required to answer important questions about the epidemiology, genetics and outcomes in late steroid-resistant NS, explore the role of medication adherence and develop evidence-based practice guidelines.

Indexed as

FemaleHumansImmunosuppressive AgentsKidneyMaleNephrotic SyndromeImmunosuppressive Agents

Identifiers

PMID23708761
OpenAlexW2142458141

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.