Trial reportSurgical endoscopy2013
Long-term results of endoscopic sympathetic block using the Lin-Telaranta classification.
Trial report in Surgical endoscopy, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- The impact of endoscopic thoracic sympathectomy on sudomotor function in patients with palmar hyperhidrosis.Clinical autonomic research : official journal of the Clinical Autonomic Research Society · 2021Article
- Thoracic sympathectomy: a review of current indications.Surgical endoscopy · 2016Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundEndoscopic thoracic sympathectomy has been used successfully in the treatment of blushing, excessive sweating, and social phobia. However, the adverse effects of endoscopic thoracic sympathectomy are more severe and frequent than the adverse effects of endoscopic sympathetic block (ESB). The use of different blocking levels for different indications in ESB according to the Lin-Telaranta classification further decreases the postoperative adverse effects. However, there are few data on the long-term results of ESB performed using the Lin-Telaranta classification.
methodsNinety-five patients (55 men, 40 women) were interviewed by before the surgery using our routine questionnaire, and the same questionnaire was answered postoperatively by the patients. In addition, a long-term follow-up questionnaire was sent to all patients whose address was known. Forty-seven patients (24 men, 23 women) answered to this questionnaire. The Davidson brief social phobia scale and the Liebowitz quality of life scale were used. Patients were divided to 3 categories: category 1, patients with sweating problems; category 2, patients with blushing; and category 3, and patients with symptoms other than sweating or blushing.
resultsAmong patients in category 1, social phobia decreased from 12.43 to 6.71 (p = 0.004), in category 2 from 13.97 to 7.69 (p < 0.001), and in category 3 from 13.18 to 9.64 (p = 0.007) during long-term follow-up. Among patients with severe sweating problems preoperatively, sweating decreased from 2.50 to 1.29 (p = 0.003) among patients in category 1 and from 1.86 to 1.16 (p < 0.001) among patients in category 2. Among patients with unbearable blushing, blushing decreased from 4 to 1.80 (p < 0.001).
conclusionsPatients got a clear help from ESB performed using the Lin-Telaranta classification to treat blushing, excessive sweating, and social phobia with and without physical symptoms. In addition, compensatory sweating increased only slightly.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.