Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23708712›Full record

SynthesisSurgical endoscopy2013

Chylothorax after esophagectomy for cancer: impact of the surgical approach and neoadjuvant treatment: systematic review and institutional analysis.

Michael Kranzfelder, Ralf Gertler, Alexander Hapfelmeier, Helmut Friess, Marcus Feith

Abstract readComparative StudySystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Surgical endoscopy, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 64 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Management of chyle leaks following esophageal resection: a systematic review.Diseases of the esophagus : official journal of the International Society for Diseases of the Esophagus · 2021
    Pooled it
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Clinical implications of chyle leakage following esophagectomy.Diseases of the esophagus : official journal of the International Society for Diseases of the Esophagus · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. [Treatment of chylothorax].Der Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen · 2018
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Michael KranzfelderDepartment of Surgery, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Ismaninger Straße 22, 81675, Munich, Germany, michael.kranzfelder@tum.de.
Ralf Gertler
Alexander Hapfelmeier
Helmut Friess
Marcus Feith
Technical University of Munich · DEKlinikum rechts der Isar · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEsophagectomy is a challenging operation with considerable potential for postoperative complications, including chylothorax.

methodsBecause no randomized controlled trial or metaanalysis is available to clarify the incidence of chylothorax in esophageal cancer surgery, the authors analyzed their own institutional data for 1,856 patients and performed a systematic review using the MEDLINE database (9,794 patients) to identify risk factors, compare success rates of therapeutic approaches, and investigate long-term outcomes.

resultsThe overall institutional chylothorax rate was 2 % (n = 39). Reoperation was performed for 69 % of the patients. No significant difference was noted between the transthoracic and transhiatal approaches. Regression analysis showed neoadjuvant treatment (odds ratio [OR], 0.302; p = 0.001) and tumor type (OR, 0.304; p = 0.002) to be independent risk factors. The systematic review included 12 studies. Chylothorax occurred for 2.6 % of the patients. Treatment favored reoperation in five studies (70-100 %) and a conservative approach in four studies (58-72 %), with equal mortality rates. No significant difference was found between the transthoracic and transhiatal approaches.

conclusionChylothorax rates are low in high-volume centers (2-3 %). No significant difference was noted between the transthoracic and transhiatal approaches. Neoadjuvant treatment and tumor type were shown to be independent risk factors. Treatment concept (reoperation vs conservative treatment) did not affect long-term survival.

Indexed as

AdenocarcinomaAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAnastomosis, SurgicalAntineoplastic AgentsCarcinoma, Squamous CellChemoradiotherapyChylothoraxCombined Modality TherapyEsophageal NeoplasmsEsophagectomyFemaleHumansIncidenceIntraoperative ComplicationsAntineoplastic Agents

Identifiers

PMID23708712
OpenAlexW2134075402

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.