Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23708613›Full record

ArticleJournal of molecular modeling2013

A method for in silico identification of SNAIL/SLUG DNA binding potentials to the E-box sequence using molecular dynamics and evolutionary conserved amino acids.

Jeremy W Prokop, Yuanjie Liu, Amy Milsted, Hongzhuang Peng, Frank J Rauscher

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of molecular modeling, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jeremy W ProkopProgram of Integrated Bioscience, The University of Akron, Akron, OH 44325, USA. jwp7@zips.uakron.edu
Yuanjie Liu
Amy Milsted
Hongzhuang Peng
Frank J Rauscher

Funding

Tumor Microenvironment and MetastasisP30CA010815 · NCI · WISTAR INSTITUTE · PI Luis J Montaner · 1985 to 2026
$75.9M
TRAINING PROGRAM IN BASIC CANCER RESEARCHT32CA009171 · NCI · WISTAR INSTITUTE · PI Alessandro Gardini · 1985 to 2026
$15.3M
Functional Analysis of the BAP1 Metastasis Suppressor Gene in Uveal MelanomaR01CA163761 · NCI · WISTAR INSTITUTE · PI RAUSCHER III, FRANK JOSEPH · 2012 to 2016
$1.8M
Role of Gene Silencing in the DNA Damage ResponseR01CA129833 · NCI · WISTAR INSTITUTE · PI RAUSCHER III, FRANK JOSEPH · 2009 to 2013
$1.4M
NCI NIH HHS CA010815NCI NIH HHS CA129833NCI NIH HHS CA163761NCI NIH HHS P30 CA010815NCI NIH HHS R01 CA129833NCI NIH HHS R01 CA163761NCI NIH HHS T32 CA009171NCI NIH HHS T32 CA09171
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Binding of transcription factors to DNA is a dynamic process allowing for spatial- and sequence-specificity. Many methods for determination of DNA-protein structures do not allow for identification of dynamics of the search process, but provide only a single snapshot of the most stable binding. In order to better understand the dynamics of DNA binding as a protein encounters its cognate site, we have created a computer-based DNA scanning array macro that sequentially inserts a high affinity DNA consensus binding site at all possible locations in a predicted protein-DNA interface. We show, using short molecular dynamic simulations at each location in the interface, that energy minimized states and decreased movement of evolutionary conserved amino acids can be readily observed and used to predict the consensus binding site. The macro was applied to SNAIL class C2H2 zinc finger family proteins. The analysis suggests that (1) SNAIL binds to the E-box in multiple states during its encounter with its cognate site; (2) several different amino acids contribute to the E-box binding in each state; (3) the linear array of zinc fingers contributes differentially to overall folding and base-pair recognition; and (4) each finger may be specialized for stability and sequence specificity. Moreover, the macromolecular movement observed using this dynamic approach may allow the NH2-terminal finger to bind without sequence specificity yet result in higher binding energy. This macro and overall approach could be applicable to many evolutionary conserved transcription factor families and should help to better elucidate the varied mechanisms used for DNA sequence-specific binding.

Indexed as

E-Box ElementsMolecular Dynamics SimulationAmino Acid SequenceBinding SitesComputer SimulationDNAMolecular ConformationMolecular Docking SimulationMolecular Sequence DataProtein BindingSnail Family Transcription FactorsTranscription FactorsZinc FingersDNASnail Family Transcription FactorsTranscription Factors

Identifiers

PMID23708613
PMCPMC3745821

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.