ReviewBMJ quality & safety2014
Practices to prevent venous thromboembolism: a brief review.
Review in BMJ quality & safety, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 59 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
59 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 127 citations in OpenAlex.
- Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Interventions for implementation of thromboprophylaxis in hospitalized patients at risk for venous thromboembolism.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2018Pooled it
- Use of Computerized Clinical Decision Support Systems to Prevent Venous Thromboembolism in Surgical Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.JAMA surgery · 2017Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Alert-Triggered Patient Education Versus Nurse Feedback for Nonadministered Venous Thromboembolism Prophylaxis Doses: A Cluster-Randomized Controlled Trial.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2022Trial
- Dose-adjusted enoxaparin thromboprophylaxis in hospitalized cancer patients: a randomized, double-blinded multicenter phase 2 trial.Blood advances · 2020Trial
- Effect of Real-time Patient-Centered Education Bundle on Administration of Venous Thromboembolism Prevention in Hospitalized Patients.JAMA network open · 2018Trial
- Trial
- Article
- Improving adherence to venous thromboembolism prophylaxis guidelines in surgical inpatients: a closed-loop clinical audit in a resource-limited setting.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2026Article
- Right-Sizing Thromboprophylaxis in Medical Inpatients.JAMA network open · 2026Article
- Adherence to Treatment, Quality of Life, and Level of Knowledge in Patients on Anticoagulant Therapy with Vitamin K Antagonists.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Construction and application of a smart hospital platform-based VTE risk management system.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Meta-analysis of Randomized Trials in Emergency and Acute Orthopedic Trauma Comparing Aspirin and Low-Molecular-Weight Heparin for Thromboprophylaxis.Orthopedic reviews · 2026Article
- Implementing a Patient-Centered Education Bundle to Improve Venous Thromboembolism Prevention.JAMA surgery · 2025Article
- Clinical Audit on Venous Thromboembolism (VTE) Risk Assessment and Guideline Adherence in Surgical Practice.Cureus · 2025Article
- Clinical Audit of Venous Thromboembolism (VTE) Risk Assessment and Guideline Compliance in Surgical Practice.Cureus · 2025Article
- Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundVenous thromboembolism (VTE) is a common cause of preventable harm for hospitalised patients. Over the past decade, numerous intervention types have been implemented in attempts to improve the prescription of VTE prophylaxis in hospitals, with varying degrees of success. We reviewed key articles to assess the efficacy of different types of interventions to improve prescription of VTE prophylaxis for hospitalised patients.
methodsWe conducted a search of MEDLINE for key studies published between 2001 and 2012 of interventions employing education, paper based tools, computerised tools, real time audit and feedback, or combinations of intervention types to improve prescription of VTE prophylaxis for patients in hospital settings. Process outcomes of interest were prescription of any VTE prophylaxis and best practice VTE prophylaxis. Clinical outcomes of interest were any VTE and potentially preventable VTE, defined as VTE occurring in patients not prescribed appropriate prophylaxis.
results16 articles were included in this review. Two studies employed education only, four implemented paper based tools, four used computerised tools, two evaluated audit and feedback strategies, and four studies used combinations of intervention types. Individual modalities result in improved prescription of VTE prophylaxis; however, the greatest and most sustained improvements were those that combined education with computerised tools.
conclusionsMany intervention types have proven effective to different degrees in improving VTE prevention. Provider education is likely a required additional component and should be combined with other intervention types. Active mandatory tools are likely more effective than passive ones. Information technology tools that are well integrated into provider workflow, such as alerts and computerised clinical decision support, can improve best practice prophylaxis use and prevent patient harm resulting from VTE.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.