Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23708352›Full record

ArticleBiophysical journal2013

Quantitative study of the elastic modulus of loosely attached cells in AFM indentation experiments.

Maxim E Dokukin, Nataliia V Guz, Igor Sokolov

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biophysical journal, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. TheMaterials today. Bio · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Difference in biophysical properties of cancer-initiating cells in melanoma mutated zebrafish.Journal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials · 2020
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Maxim E DokukinDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Tufts University, Medford, Massachusetts, USA.
Nataliia V Guz
Igor Sokolov

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

When measuring the elastic (Young's) modulus of cells using AFM, good attachment of cells to a substrate is paramount. However, many cells cannot be firmly attached to many substrates. A loosely attached cell is more compliant under indenting. It may result in artificially low elastic modulus when analyzed with the elasticity models assuming firm attachment. Here we suggest an AFM-based method/model that can be applied to extract the correct Young's modulus of cells loosely attached to a substrate. The method is verified by using primary breast epithelial cancer cells (MCF-7) at passage 4. At this passage, approximately one-half of cells develop enough adhesion with the substrate to be firmly attached to the substrate. These cells look well spread. The other one-half of cells do not develop sufficient adhesion, and are loosely attached to the substrate. These cells look spherical. When processing the AFM indentation data, a straightforward use of the Hertz model results in a substantial difference of the Young's modulus between these two types of cells. If we use the model presented here, we see no statistical difference between the values of the Young's modulus of both poorly attached (round) and firmly attached (close to flat) cells. In addition, the presented model allows obtaining parameters of the brush surrounding the cells. The cellular brush observed is also statistically identical for both types of cells. The method described here can be applied to study mechanics of many other types of cells loosely attached to substrates, e.g., blood cells, some stem cells, cancerous cells, etc.

Indexed as

Elastic ModulusCell AdhesionHumansMCF-7 CellsMicroscopy, Atomic Force

Identifiers

PMID23708352
PMCPMC3660635

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.