ArticleJournal of bacteriology2013
Role of cis-acting sites in stimulation of the phage λ P(RM) promoter by CI-mediated looping.
Article in Journal of bacteriology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- RNA polymerase efficiently transcribes through DNA-scaffolded, cooperative bacteriophage repressor complexes.FEBS letters · 2022Article
- The loopometer: a quantitative in vivo assay for DNA-looping proteins.Nucleic acids research · 2021Article
- The Developmental Switch in Bacteriophage λ: A Critical Role of the Cro Protein.Journal of molecular biology · 2018Article
- New Insights into the Phage Genetic Switch: Effects of Bacteriophage Lambda Operator Mutations on DNA Looping and Regulation of PJournal of molecular biology · 2016Article
- Bacteriophage lambda: Early pioneer and still relevant.Virology · 2015Review
- Bacteriophage lambda repressor mediates the formation of a complex enhancer-like structure.TranscriptionArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The lysogenic state of phage λ is maintained by the CI repressor. CI binds to three operators each in the right operator (O(R)) and left operator (O(L)) regions, which lie 2.4 kb apart. At moderate CI levels, the predominant binding pattern is two dimers of CI bound cooperatively at each regulatory region. The resulting tetramers can then interact, forming an octamer and a loop of the intervening DNA. CI is expressed from the P(RM) promoter, which lies in the O(R) region and is subjected to multiple regulatory controls. Of these, the most recently discovered is stimulation by loop formation. In this work, we have investigated the mechanism by which looping stimulates P(RM). We find that two cis-acting sites lying in the O(L) region are involved. One site, an UP element, is required for stimulation. Based on the behavior of other promoters with UP elements located upstream of the -35 region, we suggest that a subunit of RNA polymerase (RNAP) bound at P(RM) binds to the UP element located in the O(L) region. In addition, adjacent to the UP element lies a binding site for integration host factor (IHF); this site plays a less critical role but is required for stimulation of the weak prm240 allele. A loop with CI at the O(L)2 and O(L)3 operators does not stimulate P(RM), while one with CI only at O(L)2 provides some stimulation. We discuss possible mechanisms for stimulation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.