Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23706668›Full record

ReviewImmunity2013

Immune sensing of DNA.

Søren R Paludan, Andrew G Bowie

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Immunity, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 466 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
466citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
33.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

466 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 731 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. TBK1-NQO1 negative feedback loop regulates antiviral innate immunity.Cell communication and signaling : CCS · 2026
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review

406 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Søren R PaludanDepartment of Biomedicine, University of Aarhus, Aarhus 8000, Denmark. srp@microbiology.au.dk
Andrew G Bowie
Aarhus University · DKTrinity College Dublin · IE

Funding

DNA sensors and associated signaling pathways in the innate immune responseR01AI093752 · NIAID · UNIV OF MASSACHUSETTS MED SCH WORCESTER · PI FITZGERALD, KATHERINE A. · 2012 to 2016
$1.7M
NIAID NIH HHS AI093752NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI093752
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although it has been appreciated for some years that cytosolic DNA is immune stimulatory, it is only in the past five years that the molecular basis of DNA sensing by the innate immune system has begun to be revealed. In particular it has been described how DNA induces type I interferon, central in antiviral responses and a mediator of autoimmunity. To date more than ten cytosolic receptors of DNA have been proposed, but STING is a key adaptor protein for most DNA-sensing pathways, and we are now beginning to understand the signaling mechanisms for STING. In this review we describe the recent progress in understanding signaling mechanisms activated by DNA and the relevance of DNA sensing to pathogen responses and autoimmunity. We highlight new insights gained into how and why the immune system responds to both pathogen and self DNA and define important questions that now need to be addressed in the field of innate immune activation by DNA.

Indexed as

AnimalsAutoimmunityCell CommunicationCytosolDEAD-box RNA HelicasesDNAHumansImmunity, InnateInterferon Type IMembrane ProteinsSignal TransductionSTING ProteinDEAD-box RNA HelicasesDNAInterferon Type IMembrane ProteinsSTING1 protein, humanSTING Protein

Identifiers

PMID23706668
PMCPMC3683625
OpenAlexW1997069349

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.